Kevin Pumphrey was receiving collection calls for several years about student loans that he did not owe, in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). However, after he learned that he could sue the collection agency for harassment, the agency settled the case and left him alone.

In another case, Michael L. Hughes started getting the harassing calls from a debt collector claiming that he owed $12,000. After checking his credit report, he realized the debt collectors had the wrong person. His credit report showed a $12,000 debt owed by a Michael “B” Hughes.

This practice known as “debt tagging” prompted a Federal Trade Commission investigation (FTC) of Credit Bureau Collection Services, or CBCS. The company agreed to pay more than $1 million to settle charges that it violated federal law by inaccurately reporting credit information and by pressing consumers to pay debts they did not owe.

Sometimes, as in the case of Hughes, they go after consumers with similar names as those who owe money. Debt collectors also call wrong phone numbers, hoping to pry information out of whoever answers. Some manage to get enough identifying information to make people seem liable for debts they do not owe.

According to the FTC, it receives more complaints about the debt-collection industry than about any other industry.

J. Reilly Dolan, assistant director of the FTC’s Division of Financial Practices in Washington, said his team made a point of bringing the CBCS case. “It’s not an isolated incident,” Dolan said. “We want a case out there to make sure everyone understands it’s not acceptable.” He said the FTC expects to continue challenging such practices.

Valerie Hayes, general counsel for Association of Credit and Collections (ACA), said debt collectors can err when the debtor gets a different phone number from the one first used. Or someone who moves into the home of a debtor might receive that person’s bills or other communications.

Those random connections can pay off for debt collectors. Some unscrupulous collectors will pursue a person who might cave under pressure. Mark Fullbright, fraud specialist at Identity Theft 911, said CBCS called one of his clients, Molly Harrington, and managed to get her to divulge her Social Security number. Then Harrington, got a bill for $4,197 from an electric company for power at a house in Putnam, Connecticut. But she was from Chepachet, Rhode Island and had never lived in Connecticut, nor did she own property in Connecticut.

Jay Foley, Executive Director at the Identity Theft Resource Center, said “a person who is being harassed by a debt collector should write a certified letter to the agency explaining that they are contacting the wrong person. If the collector does not stop, document everything and consult a consumer protection attorney.”

If you are being harassed by a debt collector in violation of the FDCPA, you may be entitled to compensation. Please call California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...