<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Consumer Class Action &#8211; Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman | Los Angeles Employment Attorneys, Consumer Rights Attorneys</title>
	<atom:link href="https://toddflaw.com/blog/result-category/consumer-class-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://toddflaw.com</link>
	<description>Los Angeles Employment Lawyers and Consumer Protection Attorneys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 16:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Anne Wolf v. Hewlett Packard Company</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/anne-wolf-v-hewlett-packard-company/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/anne-wolf-v-hewlett-packard-company/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anne Wolf v. Hewlett Packard Company: 5:15-cv-01221-BRO-GJS (C.D. Cal.) CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ahmed v. HSBC Bank USA</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/ahmed-v-hsbc-bank-usa/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/ahmed-v-hsbc-bank-usa/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ahmed v. HSBC Bank USA: Federal Court TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re GM/LG Battery Defect Litigation</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/in-re-gm-lg-battery-defect-litigation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/in-re-gm-lg-battery-defect-litigation/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In re GM/LG Battery Defect Litigation: E.D. Mich. (Judge Terrence G. Berg) Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gehrich, et al. v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. &#038; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/gehrich-et-al-v-chase-bank-usa-n-a-jpmorgan-chase-bank-n-a/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/gehrich-et-al-v-chase-bank-usa-n-a-jpmorgan-chase-bank-n-a/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gehrich, et al. v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. &#038; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.: 1:12-cv-05510 (N.D. Ill.) One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gail Medeiros, et al. v. HSBC</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/gail-medeiros-et-al-v-hsbc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/gail-medeiros-et-al-v-hsbc/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gail Medeiros, et al. v. HSBC: Federal Court Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California&#8217;s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alfred Zaklit, et al. v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/alfred-zaklit-et-al-v-nationstar-mortgage-llc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/alfred-zaklit-et-al-v-nationstar-mortgage-llc/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Alfred Zaklit, et al. v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC: Federal Court Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>QC Holdings TCPA Class Action</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/qc-holdings-tcpa-class-action/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/qc-holdings-tcpa-class-action/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[QC Holdings TCPA Class Action: C.D. Cal. TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kim v. Tinder, Inc.</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/kim-v-tinder-inc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/kim-v-tinder-inc/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kim v. Tinder, Inc.: C.D. Cal. Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder&#8217;s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Ross v Zurixx</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/ron-ross-v-zurixx/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/slug-29/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Craig Cunningham v. Lexington Law Firm</title>
		<link>https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/craig-cunningham-v-lexington-law-firm/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddfriedmadev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://toddflaw.com/blog/result/slug-6/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated his preliminary approval of a $150 million class-action settlement to resolve class action claims against GM and LG, addressing the defective batteries that posed serious safety risks. The litigation, which began in December 2020, saw over 100,000 class members united in seeking redress for the hazards linked to their vehicles.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
