Almost every day we hear of another vehicle recall, but no one really cares unless your car is in the “recall list”.

recall is a request to return to the manufacturer an entire production run of a certain make and model of vehicle, usually due to the discovery of safety issues. When this happens, car owners  are requested to take their vehicles to the manufacturer’s official repair facilities for investigation and repair if needed.  But the problem is that not all car owners respond to the request. According to Carfax there were more than 2.7 million used vehicles for sale over the Internet in 2011 with safety recalls that were never fixed.

If a manufacturer officially announces a recall for a model line, consumers hardly ever face any problems to get their cars repaired for free, cause that’s an obvious consequence of a recall. But more often car consumers come up with vehicle defects and problems outside of safety recalls and here’s where the real troubles begin. Not every manufacturer will accept its wrong and be willing to buyback your car or replace it with a new one. You need to prove that the car is a lemon and that you are eligible to demand certain compensation under the state lemon law.

In California,  if the manufacturer has performed at least 2 repair attempts or the car has been under repair for at least 30 calendar days within 18 months from delivery of the car or 18,000 miles, whichever occurs first, then the car is quite likely to be legally considered a lemon.

If you think you own a lemon, please call my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman for a free consultation at (877) 449-8898.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...