A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Misrepresentation

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

What You Should Know About Debt Collection

Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), debt collectors are prohibited from misrepresenting themselves to you as well as information about your debt. However, this does not stop collection agencies from impersonating figures of authority and mischaracterizing possible penalties in an effort to coerce people to pay the debt. If a creditor is using such illegal tactics on you, you may be entitled to compensation.

Commonly Used Tactics

While debt collectors employ many collection strategies, some of the biggest misrepresentations reported include:

  • Identifying themselves as law enforcement officers, officers of the court or attorneys
  • Giving a false company name to hide the fact that they are a third-party debt collection company
  • Indicating that nonpayment of the debt can result in your arrest or your name being published in the newspaper
  • Mischaracterizing the amount of the debt
  • Implying they have a right to seize all of your assets

If a debt collector has engaged in any of these harassment methods when contacting you, your rights under the FDCPA may have been violated and our nationwide attorneys may be able to help.

What Collectors Are Required To Do

The FDCPA prohibits debt collectors from harassing customers and sets forth certain guidelines they must follow when contacting you, such as:

  • Correctly identifying themselves
  • Correctly identifying the original creditor
  • Notifying you of your right to dispute the debt
  • Providing verification of the debt in writing upon request

If these guidelines are not being adhered to by a debt collector who is communicating with you, we can help you assert your rights and hold the collector accountable.

Our Attorneys Are On Your Side

At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., our lawyers are available at any time to go over your situation and assess your options. Speak directly with one of our attorneys.

We serve clients nationwide. Our California offices are in Calabasas, although we have offices in Chicago, Illinois, Cleveland, Ohio and King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, as well. Contact us today to schedule a free initial consultation by calling toll free or by filling out our online form.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.