A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Consumers Are Protected From Aggressive Debt Collection Practices

Sometimes the poor treatment of a customer is more than just bad business — it’s illegal. If you are being harassed by a debt collector, the collections agency may be in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

The FDCPA outlines how debt collectors — such as bill collectors, collections agencies and corporate collections departments — can go about seeking the repayment of debt from consumers. The FDCPA forbids aggressive practices such as:

  • Making violent threats
  • Threatening to file a lawsuit
  • Using profane or obscene language
  • Calling friends and/or family members
  • Attempting to reach debtors at work
  • Threatening to garnish wages
  • Early morning and/or late-night calls
  • Misrepresenting one’s identity

How Can The FDCPA Help You As A Consumer?

If the above practices or other abusive behavior has been used against you in an attempt to collect debts, you may be able to obtain compensation according to the provisions of the law. In addition to financial compensation, the FDCPA can put a stop to the harassment and to debt collectors contacting you.

To learn more about the FDCPA, see:

Had Enough Of Debt Collectors? Put Our Attorney On Your Side.

At the Law offices of Todd M. Friedman in Calabasas, California, we are committed to protecting the rights of consumers. If you cannot take the harassment and abuse another day, we want to make things right for you.

Contact us today to schedule a free initial consultation with our nationwide FDCPA lawyer. You speak directly with an attorney when you work with our firm, saving you time and alleviating uncertainty.

Fair Debt Collection Protection Act Illegal Threats

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is the federal law relating to debt collection practices that prohibits debt collection agencies from using abusive, unfair, or deceptive practices to collect debts. If you think a debt collection company has violated the FDCPA in its debt collection efforts with you, then you should seek the help of an FDCPA attorney.

When you are dealing with a debt collector or currently have a debt that could soon go into collection, you should be aware of what debt collection agencies may do under the law as well as what they are not allowed to do. The FDCPA is codified under Title 15 U.S Code § 1692 and makes the following tactics illegal.

Prohibited Tactics Under the FDCPA

With certain exceptions, a debt collection agency cannot contact a third party about your debt. Debt collectors may contact your attorney because when the debt collector knows you have legal representation, it must talk to the attorney only instead of you unless you give the debt collector permission to contact you or your attorney does not respond to the communications.

A debt collector can also contact a credit reporting agency and the original creditor. They are also able to contact your spouse, your parents (when you are a minor), and any of your codebtors. 

They cannot make any of these contacts when you have sent a letter asking them to cease such communications. A debt collector can also contact a third party for the specific purpose of getting information about your whereabouts. 

In such contacts, debt collectors:

  • Cannot say that you owe a debt
  • Must state their name and state that they are confirming location information about you
  • Cannot identify an employer unless asked
  • Cannot contact a third party more than one time unless required to do so by that third party, or unless they believe a third party’s earlier response was wrong or incomplete and that party has the correct or complete information
  • Cannot communicate with a postcard
  • Cannot use symbols or words on the outside of an envelope indicating they are trying to collect a debt if either gives away the purpose of the letter
  • Cannot call third parties for location information when they know an attorney represents you

A debt collector’s initial communication with you needs to tell you that they are trying to collect a debt and also that any information that they obtain from you will be used for that purpose. The debt collector also needs to state that the communication is from a debt collector in subsequent communications. 

In any later communications, a debt collector has to tell you the collector’s name and the collection agency’s name. Debt collectors do not have to identify which consumers cannot communicate in English, nor provide translations in multiple languages.

A debt collector will be forbidden from contacting you:

  • at an inconvenient or unusual time or place (calls before 8 a.m. and after 9 p.m. are generally prohibited, although for people who work nights and sleep during the day, calls in the middle of the afternoon could then be inconvenient
  • Directly when the debt collector knows or should know that you have an attorney
  • at work when a debt collector knows that your employer prohibits you from receiving collections calls at your place of employment

Debt collection agencies are also forbidden from engaging in conduct that is meant to harass, oppress, or abuse. This means they cannot:

  • use obscene, profane, or abusive language
  • call you repeatedly
  • use or threaten to use violence
  • make telephone calls to you without identifying the caller as a bill collector.
  • either harm or threaten to harm you, another person, or your or another person’s reputation or property
  • list any of your debt for sale to the public
  • publish your name as a person who does not pay bills 

The FDCPA establishes that a debt collector cannot call a debtor more than seven times in seven consecutive days or within any period of seven consecutive days after they have a telephone conversation with a debtor in connection with the collection of such debt. The date of a telephone conversation will be the first day of the seven-consecutive-day period.

The limitation applies to each particular debt, not per consumer. This means a debt collector is able to call you more often if you owe on several debts when they are trying to collect. 

The limitation on telephone call frequency limit includes three exclusions:

  • calls in which you gave prior consent
  • calls not connected to a dialed number
  • calls placed to specific professional persons, such as an attorney

A collection agency cannot lie. This means it is prohibited from:

  • claiming to be a law enforcement agency or suggesting that it is connected with the federal, state, or local government
  • falsely representing the amount you owe or the amount of compensation the collection agency will receive
  • claiming to be an attorney or that a communication is from an attorney
  • claiming that you will be imprisoned or your property will be seized, unless a collection agency or original creditor actually intends to take action that may result in your going to jail or property being taken
  • threatening to take actions that are not actually intended or cannot be taken
  • falsely claiming you have committed a crime
  • threatening to sell a debt to a third party, and claim that, as a result, you will lose defenses to payment you had against the creditor, such as a breach of warranty
  • communicating false credit information
  • sending you a document that looks like it is from a court or attorney or part of a legal process if it is not
  • using a false business name
  • claiming to be employed by a credit bureau unless the collection agency and the credit bureau are the same company

A debt collection agency also cannot engage in any unfair or outrageous method to collect a debt. This means it cannot:

  • add interest, fees, or charges that were not authorized in the original agreement or by state law
  • ask for a postdated check for the sole purpose of threatening you with criminal prosecution
  • accept any check postdated by more than five days unless the debt collector notifies you between three and 10 days in advance of when it intends to deposit the check
  • deposit any postdated check prior to the date written on the check
  • cause you to incur any communications charges, such as collect call fees, by concealing the real purpose of the communication
  • threaten to repossess or seize your property when it has no right to do so or no intention of doing so
  • communicate with you by postcard
  • put any symbols or words on the outside of an envelope sent to you that indicate it is trying to collect a debt

A debt collector also cannot communicate or attempt to communicate with you by sending email to any email address that the debt collector knows is a work email address. Exceptions to this rule may include when a debt collector sends messages to your work email when you used the email address to communicate with the debt collector about the debt and you have not opted out since or when you gave prior consent directly to a debt collector that it could use the work email address and you have not withdrawn that consent.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About FDCPA Illegal Threats

How do I report debt collectors for doing something illegal?

Your first step should be to contact an FDCPA attorney. A qualified attorney will help you report any problems you have with a debt collector to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), or your state attorney general. Most states have their own debt collection laws that are different from federal laws, so your state attorney general’s office will be able to help you determine your rights under your state laws.

What can I do when I think a debt collector broke the law?

In addition to reporting them, you can sue a debt collector in a state or federal court. You will have to file such a lawsuit within one year of when the debt collector broke the law. If you lose wages or incurred medical bills because of what a debt collector did, you can sue for those damages as well. If you cannot prove damages, the judge may still award you up to $1,000 as well as reimburse you for attorney’s fees and court costs. 

Is a debt collector right to state that my federal benefits may be garnished?

When you have an unpaid debt, a creditor or debt collector could get a court order to try and take money from your bank account to pay the debt, often called a garnishment. Most federal benefits are exempt from garnishment, except in cases involving payment of child support, alimony, delinquent taxes, or student loans. 

States will have their own laws about which state benefits can be garnished. Federal benefits that are usually exempt from garnishment include Social Security benefits, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits, veterans benefits, federal student aid, military annuities and survivors’ benefits, benefits from the Office of Personnel Management, railroad retirement benefits, and federal emergency disaster assistance.

Call Us Today to Schedule a Free Consultation with an FDCPA Attorney

Do you believe a debt collector acted illegally while contacting you? The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. can handle your case and fight to make sure the debt collector is held accountable.

Our firm understands what constitutes FDCPA violations and knows how to make sure that you are able to achieve a certain measure of justice. Call (818) 646-5690 or contact us online to take advantage of a free consultation that will allow us to review your case and go over everything we might be able to do for you.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Verdict

November 2007 jury verdict against Honda for breach of warranty in Orange County Superior Court.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Lemon Law jury trial verdict against Honda in 2006. Plaintiff prevailed on claims that vehicle failed to conform to warranty after reasonable repair attempts.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

August 4, 2005 jury verdict for breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended the appeal in this case.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Trial victory against Mercedes-Benz USA for Lemon Law violations and breach of express and implied warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended Mercedes’ subsequent appeal (B192382).

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.

More Details
$400,000–$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

Co-lead class counsel in consolidated Unfair Competition Law class action alleging HP covertly pushed a firmware update that prevented consumers’ printers from accepting third-party ink cartridges. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

FCRA class action for improper credit pulls (unauthorized hard inquiries). Certified under Rule 23 by contested motion and settled on a class-wide basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

PAGA settlement in wage and hour action on behalf of employees. Settlement approval granted.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.