A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Kim v. Tinder, Inc.

323-690-1688

Table Of Contents

Summarize with

Kim v. Tinder, Inc.: C.D. Cal.

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed

Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details

$2.4M

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.

More Details

$750,000

Settlement

Class Action

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details

$900,000+

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.

More Details

$27.6M

Settlement

Class Action

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details

Verdict

More Details

$5.2M

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

More Details

$260,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Class action settlement resolving claims under various California wage and hour employment laws. California State Judge approved October 1, 2018.

More Details

$390,000

Settlement

Employment Class Action / Employment Law

PAGA settlement in wage and hour action on behalf of employees. Settlement approval granted.

More Details

$390,000

Settlement

Class Action

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details

$1,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details

$2,400,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Class-wide settlement in wage and hour independent contractor misclassification class action on behalf of approximately 1,800 valet employees. Final approval granted.

More Details

$2,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Wage and hour class action for independent contractor misclassification on behalf of 230 employees. Final approval granted.

More Details

$6,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details

$13,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details

$34,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details

$150,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details

$100,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

$650,000

Settlement