A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Identity Theft on Credit Report

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Identity Theft: Credit Bureaus Won’t Remove Fraudulent Accounts

You discovered accounts on your credit report that don’t belong to you—credit cards you never opened, loans you never took out, collections for debts that aren’t yours. You filed identity theft reports with the FTC and police, disputed the fraudulent accounts with Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion, and provided all required documentation. But the credit bureaus still won’t remove the accounts, or they removed them temporarily and then re-inserted them. Identity theft victims have special protections under FCRA, and when credit bureaus fail to remove fraudulent accounts after proper notice, you can sue them. Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. represents identity theft victims nationwide.

Credit Report Shows Accounts That Aren’t Yours

Sometimes you’ll find accounts on your credit report that aren’t from identity theft—they’re from mixed credit files where the bureau confused you with someone else (common with Jr./Sr., similar names, or shared addresses), from ex-spouse debts that should have been removed, or from clerical errors by creditors. Regardless of how the error occurred, these accounts don’t belong on your credit report, and credit bureaus must remove them when you dispute them with proper documentation. When they refuse, claiming the accounts are “verified,” you have legal recourse under FCRA.

Why Credit Bureaus Resist Removing Fraudulent Accounts

Even when you provide police reports, FTC identity theft affidavits, and detailed explanations that accounts are fraudulent, credit bureaus often resist removal. They make excuses: the furnisher “verified” the account, you need to provide more documentation, the investigation is “ongoing” past the 30-day deadline, or they simply ignore your dispute. The truth is that credit bureaus profit from selling credit data, and removing accounts reduces the information they can sell. When bureaus prioritize profit over accuracy—especially in identity theft cases—they violate federal law.

FCRA Protections for Identity Theft Victims

The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires credit bureaus to block fraudulent accounts when you provide an identity theft report and proper identification. They must complete this blocking within 4 business days of receiving your request. If they refuse to block the accounts, fail to meet the deadline, or unblock the accounts without proper notice, those are FCRA violations. Additionally, creditors who continue reporting fraudulent accounts after being notified of identity theft can be sued under FCRA. You don’t have to fight identity theft alone.

Mixed Credit Files: When Someone Else’s Debts Appear on Your Report

Mixed credit files occur when credit bureaus merge your information with someone else’s—often family members with similar names, people at the same address, or individuals with similar Social Security numbers. Suddenly your credit report shows debts, bankruptcies, or foreclosures that belong to someone else entirely. This error can destroy your credit score overnight. Credit bureaus are supposed to have safeguards preventing mixed files, and when they occur, bureaus must separate the files immediately. If they’ve mixed your file and won’t fix it despite your disputes, you can sue for damages.

The Cost of Fraudulent Accounts on Your Credit Report

Accounts that don’t belong to you can devastate your credit score and your life. You might be denied a mortgage for a home you’re trying to buy, rejected for an auto loan, turned down for apartment rentals, or even lose a job offer. The emotional toll is significant—constantly fighting with credit bureaus and creditors, fearing what new fraudulent accounts might appear, and feeling violated by identity theft. Under FCRA, you can recover damages for all these harms, including financial losses, emotional distress, and punitive damages when credit bureaus act willfully.

Sue Credit Bureaus and Creditors Reporting Fraudulent Accounts

You can sue both the credit bureaus and the furnishers (creditors, debt collectors) reporting fraudulent accounts. Credit bureaus are liable for failing to remove or block fraudulent information after proper notice. Furnishers are liable for continuing to report accounts after being notified they’re fraudulent or belong to someone else. FCRA allows you to recover actual damages, statutory damages up to $1,000 per violation, and punitive damages. Defendants must pay your attorney fees, so you don’t pay legal costs out of pocket. Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. handles FCRA identity theft cases nationwide. Call 877-206-4741 for immediate help.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.