A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Los Angeles Consumer Rights Attorney

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

When corporations violate your consumer rights—whether through illegal robocalls, inaccurate credit reports, abusive debt collection, or false advertising—you deserve an attorney who fights back. At Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we’ve recovered nearly $1 billion for over 5,000 California consumers through TCPA violations, FCRA claims, FDCPA enforcement, and state consumer protection lawsuits. We work on contingency: no fee unless we win.

Super Lawyer
11 Consecutive Years
(2016–2026)
AV Preeminent
Highest Peer Rating
Martindale-Hubbell
A+ BBB
Better Business Bureau
Accredited
$1 Billion+
Consumer Recoveries
5,000+ Cases

No Fee Unless We Win. Call for a free case evaluation today.

Our Los Angeles Consumer Protection Practice Areas

We specialize in federal and California consumer protection statutes that give you real recovery options.

TCPA: Robocalls, Spam Texts & Illegal Calls

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, is one of the most powerful consumer protection statutes in America. It creates statutory damages of $500 per violation (or up to $1,500 per violation if willful), meaning you don’t have to prove financial loss—each unwanted call or text is a separate claim.

What the TCPA Covers:

  • Robocalls and prerecorded messages without prior express written consent (even from creditors you owe)
  • Automated text messages and SMS to cell phones without consent
  • Calls to numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry after 31 days
  • Calls before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. in the recipient’s time zone
  • Calls after you revoke consent (written revocation required for robocalls)
  • Calls from debt collectors without written consent under Declaratory Judgment § 227(b)(1)(B)
  • Calls using “Automatic Telephone Dialing Systems” (ATDS) — defined broadly post-Facebook v. Duguid (2021)

California Additions:

California law layers additional protections on top of federal TCPA:

  • California Penal Code § 653m — Imposes criminal liability for phone harassment; creates private right of action for violations
  • California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Civil Code § 1750 et seq. — Robocall schemes can constitute “unfair or deceptive practices”; treble damages available
  • Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 — Robocall practices are typically “unlawful” or “unfair” under California’s broadly-read statute

Key Case Law:

Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163 (2021), clarified that an “Automatic Telephone Dialing System” (ATDS) means technology that uses a random or sequential number generator. This narrowed TCPA slightly but still covers nearly all modern robocall platforms. The Supreme Court confirmed that damages flow from the technology, not just the call content.

Common TCPA Violations We Handle:

  • Debt collectors calling without written consent
  • Mortgage servicers, utilities, and auto lenders sending robocalls/texts
  • Payday lenders and online lenders using prerecorded threats
  • Survey, political, and marketing robocalls
  • Pharmacy and medical appointment reminders without prior consent
  • Calls made after revocation of prior consent
  • Calls to Do Not Call numbers

Interested in a dedicated deep-dive? See our comprehensive TCPA and Robocall page for more detail.

Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) & Credit Reporting Violations

Credit reporting errors—whether it’s a mixed file, failure to investigate a dispute, or reporting debt after bankruptcy discharge—can destroy your creditworthiness and cost you thousands in higher interest rates. The Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., lets you sue credit reporting agencies and furnishers for violations.

FCRA Damages:

  • $100–$1,000 in statutory damages per violation, regardless of actual harm
  • Actual damages (lost wages, higher mortgage rates, emotional distress)
  • Punitive damages if the agency knew it was in violation or acted with reckless disregard
  • Attorney fees and costs (prevailing plaintiff fee-shift)

California Credit Reporting Law:

California’s Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, Civil Code § 1785.1 et seq., imposes even stricter standards than federal FCRA:

  • Credit reporting agencies must provide accurate, current, and complete information
  • Agencies must conduct reasonable reinvestigation of disputed items
  • Agencies cannot report information they know is incorrect
  • Debt that is discharged in bankruptcy cannot be reported (Civ. Code § 1785.15)
  • California allows broader civil remedies and does not cap damages

Common FCRA Violations:

  • Mixed credit files (your credit report contains another person’s accounts or payment history)
  • Failure to investigate disputes — reporting agencies must investigate within 30 days
  • Reporting after bankruptcy discharge — discharged debt cannot be reported
  • Identity theft accounts — fraudulent accounts incorrectly attributed to you
  • Staleness — reporting negative items older than 7 years (or 10 for bankruptcy)
  • Lack of reinvestigation notice — agencies must tell you the results of their investigation
  • Reporting without permission — furnishers must have a legitimate reason to report

If you’ve noticed errors on your credit report or been denied credit, employment, or housing due to inaccurate reporting, a FCRA attorney can force a reinvestigation and recover damages.

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) & Rosenthal Act

Debt collectors violate federal law regularly: calling before 8 a.m., threatening arrest for consumer debt, contacting your employer, claiming false debt amounts, and refusing to validate debt. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., lets you sue for up to $1,000 statutory damages plus actual damages and attorney fees.

FDCPA Coverage & Damages:

  • Applies to third-party debt collectors (companies hired to collect on others’ debts)
  • $1,000 statutory damages per lawsuit (not per violation—but courts have interpreted this broadly in class actions)
  • Actual damages (lost sleep, anxiety, damaged relationships, lost time from work)
  • Attorney fees and costs (full fee-shift to prevailing plaintiff)
  • Injunctive relief (court order stopping illegal collection)

California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act — Broader Than FDCPA:

California Civil Code § 1788 et seq. applies to all debt collectors, including original creditors—a massive advantage over federal law. Many California creditors who violate the Rosenthal Act would escape FDCPA liability because they’re not third-party collectors.

  • Original creditors who collect are covered (unlike FDCPA)
  • $100–$1,000 statutory damages per violation — broader recovery per violation than FDCPA
  • Actual damages, treble damages if willful — treble damages are not available under FDCPA
  • Attorney fees and costs — mandatory fee-shift
  • Injunctive relief available

Common Debt Collector Violations (FDCPA & Rosenthal):

  • Calls before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. in your time zone
  • Threats of arrest, garnishment, or repossession that cannot legally occur
  • Contacting your employer, family, or friends (except to locate you)
  • False debt amounts — claiming you owe more than you do
  • Failure to provide debt validation — collector must provide amount, creditor, and your right to dispute within 5 days
  • Continued calls after revocation of consent
  • Harassment or abusive language — threats, profanity, repeated calls
  • Calling after bankruptcy discharge — debt is eliminated and cannot be collected

If a debt collector is harassing you, making false threats, or breaking the law, we can force them to stop and recover damages—often $500–$3,000+ per case.

False Advertising & Consumer Fraud

California’s consumer protection statutes are among the strongest in the nation. If a company deceives you through false advertising, misleading claims, or unfair practices, multiple statutes give you a right to sue.

Key California Statutes:

  • California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Civil Code § 1750 et seq.
    • Applies to deceptive practices in consumer transactions
    • Treble (triple) damages + attorney fees + injunctive relief
    • Class action friendly; no damage cap
  • Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200
    • Covers unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business practices
    • Extremely broad—covers nearly any deceptive conduct
    • Injunctive relief primary remedy; damages available in certain contexts
    • Class action eligible
  • False Advertising Law (FAL), Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500
    • Targets false or misleading advertising
    • Damages + attorney fees + injunctive relief
    • Class action eligible

Damages & Remedies:

  • Treble damages under CLRA (3x actual damages)
  • Actual damages (price premium paid for false claim, lost money)
  • Restitution (return of overcharged amounts)
  • Attorney fees and costs (full fee-shift)
  • Injunctive relief (court order stopping deceptive practices)
  • Punitive damages in fraud cases (actual fraud, not just innocent misrepresentation)

Common False Advertising Claims:

  • Health and supplement products with unsubstantiated claims
  • Weight loss products and services
  • Loan modification and debt relief services
  • Extended warranties and protection plans
  • Energy efficiency claims (appliances, home improvement)
  • Organic, “natural,” or “eco-friendly” labeling
  • Pricing deception (hidden fees, drip pricing)
  • Bait-and-switch advertising

We’ve handled hundreds of false advertising cases in Los Angeles and have recovered millions in treble damages and restitution.

Lemon Law: Defective Vehicles & Manufacturer Warranty

California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civil Code § 1790 et seq., is one of the strongest lemon law statutes in America. If a new or used vehicle with a manufacturer warranty has repeated defects that cannot be repaired, you have the right to a refund or replacement at no cost to you—plus attorney fees and civil penalties.

What the Lemon Law Covers:

  • New vehicles with manufacturer warranty
  • Used vehicles with remaining manufacturer warranty (not all defects covered—only covered components)
  • Defects affecting safety, use, or value — must substantially impair the vehicle

Damages & Remedies:

  • Refund or replacement (full purchase price or equivalent vehicle, minus mileage)
  • Civil penalty of $100–$250 per vehicle (treble penalty of 2x purchase price if manufacturer willfully violated the law)
  • Attorney fees and costs (mandatory fee-shift to prevailing consumer)
  • Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at statutory rates

Repair Attempts & “Reasonable Number”:

The law requires a “reasonable number of repair attempts.” California courts typically find:

  • 2 or more repair attempts for safety defects = reasonable number
  • 4 or more repair attempts for non-safety defects = reasonable number
  • Time in repair shop counts—if your car is in the shop for 30+ days total in the first year, you may have a lemon law claim

Key Points:

  • Manufacturer must be given a final opportunity to repair before you can demand a refund (Civ. Code § 1793.22)
  • Defect must manifest within the warranty period, even if repairs occur later
  • Song-Beverly applies even if express warranty has expired if defect was within warranty period
  • Dealer cannot waive lemon law rights

If your vehicle has been in the shop repeatedly or has a safety defect the manufacturer cannot fix, we can force a refund or replacement and recover your attorney fees.

Class Actions for Consumer Protection Violations

Many consumer violations are most efficiently litigated as class actions. When thousands of consumers face the same injury from the same illegal practice, a class action holds the defendant accountable and recovers massive compensation.

How Class Actions Work in California:

  1. Class Certification: One or more named plaintiffs file suit on behalf of all similarly-situated consumers (the “class”)
  2. Discovery: Both sides exchange documents and evidence
  3. Motion for Class Certification: Judge decides if the claims are appropriate for class treatment (numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy)
  4. Settlement or Trial: Case settles (usual outcome) or goes to trial
  5. Class Distribution: Settlement funds (minus attorney fees, costs, and claims administration) go to class members

Class Action Statutes We Leverage:

  • TCPA § 227(g)(3) — TCPA violations can be class actions with $500–$1,500 per class member
  • CLRA § 1781 — Consumers Legal Remedies Act permits class actions with treble damages
  • UCL § 17602 — Unfair Competition Law allows representative actions on behalf of California consumers
  • FAL § 17505 — False Advertising Law allows class actions
  • FCRA § 1681p — Fair Credit Reporting Act class actions for systematic violations

Advantages of Class Actions:

  • Individual damages may be small ($50–$500), but collectively they total millions
  • Only one case litigated—efficient for courts and defendants
  • Individual class members don’t have to hire attorneys (costs shared across class)
  • Defendant cannot ignore or settle piecemeal
  • California courts strongly favor class actions for consumer protection violations

If you suspect a company is illegally affecting thousands of consumers, we can evaluate whether your case qualifies for class certification and recover on behalf of the entire consumer group.

California Consumer Protection Laws: Stronger Than Federal

California law offers superior protections beyond federal statutes. Here’s what makes California unique:

Key California Statutes & Advantages:

Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) — Civil Code § 1750 et seq.

  • Covers all deceptive/unfair/fraudulent practices in consumer transactions
  • Treble damages (3x) — no damage cap like federal statutes
  • Attorney fees and costs mandatory
  • Injunctive relief available
  • Class action friendly

Unfair Competition Law (UCL) — Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.

  • Broadest consumer protection statute—covers “unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent” practices
  • No need to prove actual damages (injunctive relief is primary remedy)
  • Applies to both consumers and businesses
  • No damage cap
  • Attorney fees available
  • Strongest basis for class actions in California

False Advertising Law (FAL) — Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500 et seq.

  • Targets false, misleading, or deceptive advertising
  • No actual deception required—literal falsity sufficient
  • Attorney fees and costs to prevailing plaintiff
  • Damages for price premium paid

Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act — Civil Code § 1790 et seq.

  • Nation’s strongest lemon law for vehicles
  • Refund or replacement at no cost to consumer
  • Treble penalty for willful violations (2x purchase price)
  • Attorney fees mandatory

Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act — Civil Code § 1788 et seq.

  • Applies to all debt collectors, including original creditors (broader than FDCPA)
  • $100–$1,000 per violation (not per lawsuit)
  • Treble damages available if willful
  • Attorney fees and costs mandatory

California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act — Civil Code § 1785.1 et seq.

  • Stricter than federal FCRA in several areas
  • No damage caps
  • Discharged debt cannot be reported (stronger than FCRA)
  • Attorney fees to prevailing plaintiff

Why California Law Matters:

  • No damage caps: Treble damages and statutory damages can reach millions in class actions
  • Rosenthal covers original creditors: Unlike FDCPA, California law covers all debt collectors
  • CLRA allows injunctive relief: You can stop the harm immediately, not just recover money after the fact
  • UCL is extremely broad: Nearly any deceptive business practice can be challenged
  • Fee-shifting is mandatory: Defendant pays your attorney fees if you win

Statute of Limitations for California Consumer Claims:

  • CLRA: 4 years (or within 1 year of discovery if concealed)
  • UCL: 4 years
  • FAL: 3 years from discovery of falsity
  • FCRA/CCRA: 2 years from discovery (up to 5 for willful violations)
  • Rosenthal Act: 2 years from discovery (up to 4 for willful violations)
  • Song-Beverly Lemon Law: Within warranty period (4 years for new vehicles)
  • TCPA: 2 years from discovery (up to 3 for willful violations)

Time is critical: Statute of limitations vary. If you believe you have a claim, contact us immediately.

What You Can Recover in a Consumer Rights Case

Consumer protection statutes are designed to compensate you for actual harm and punish corporations for breaking the law. Here’s what damages are available:

Statutory Damages

Per-violation amounts mandated by law, regardless of actual financial harm:

  • TCPA: $500 per violation ($1,500 if willful)
  • FCRA/CCRA: $100–$1,000 per violation
  • FDCPA: Up to $1,000 per lawsuit (per case, not per violation)
  • Rosenthal Act: $100–$1,000 per violation (up to $5,000+ if willful)
  • CLRA: Statutory damages + treble damages (3x)

Actual Damages

Real, documented losses you suffered:

  • Direct financial loss (money paid under false pretense)
  • Higher interest rates due to credit report errors
  • Lost wages (time off work for disputes, court)
  • Emotional distress (proven anxiety, sleep loss, harassment)
  • Reputational harm (inability to obtain credit, employment, housing)
  • Costs of disputing false information

Treble/Punitive Damages

3x actual damages or punitive damages in certain cases:

  • CLRA treble damages: 3x actual damages (no cap)
  • Rosenthal treble damages: 3x actual damages if willful violation
  • Song-Beverly treble penalty: 2x purchase price if manufacturer willfully violated
  • Fraud/Punitive damages: Available in intentional fraud cases (no statutory cap in California)

Attorney Fees & Costs

Most consumer protection statutes include mandatory fee-shifting:

  • TCPA: Attorney fees & costs to prevailing plaintiff
  • FCRA/CCRA: Attorney fees & costs to prevailing plaintiff
  • FDCPA: Attorney fees & costs to prevailing plaintiff
  • Rosenthal Act: Attorney fees & costs mandatory
  • CLRA: Attorney fees & costs to prevailing plaintiff
  • UCL/FAL: Attorney fees to prevailing plaintiff
  • Song-Beverly: Attorney fees & costs mandatory

Key benefit: You don’t pay your attorney—the defendant does. We work on contingency.

Injunctive Relief

Court orders stopping ongoing harm:

  • Order to cease illegal robocalls or collection calls
  • Order to remove false information from credit report
  • Order to stop false advertising
  • Correction of records (credit files, debt registry)
  • Restitution to all affected consumers (in class actions)

Class Action Settlements

When violations affect many consumers:

  • Individual recoveries range from $50–$5,000+
  • Collectively, settlements often total $1M–$100M+
  • Class members receive pro-rata share of settlement fund
  • Defendant typically must fund a settlement fund equal to actual damages or statutory damages
  • Attorneys recover fees from settlement (no separate bill to you)

Contingency Representation: We take our fee from the recovery. If we don’t win, you don’t pay. This aligns our interests with yours—we only succeed if you recover.

Why Choose Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.

Plaintiff-Only Practice

We represent consumers, not corporations. We have zero conflicts of interest. We’ve recovered nearly $1 billion for over 5,000 consumers.

11 Years of Recognition

Super Lawyer recognition for 11 consecutive years (2016–2026). AV Preeminent rating. A+ BBB rating. This is no accident—it’s the result of results.

Contingency Fees

You pay nothing unless we win. No upfront retainer, no hidden fees. Our success depends on your recovery.

Direct Attorney Access

You work directly with Todd M. Friedman or his senior attorneys, not paralegals or call centers. We answer your calls and manage your case personally.

Track Record in TCPA, FCRA, FDCPA, and Lemon Law

We’ve litigated hundreds of robocall cases, credit reporting disputes, debt collection violations, and lemon law claims. We understand California’s unique protections.

Class Action Experience

We’ve certified and recovered millions in class actions for TCPA, FCRA, Rosenthal, and false advertising violations. When one consumer’s claim affects millions, we scale it appropriately.

Local Presence in Los Angeles

Based in Calabasas (Ventura County), serving all of Los Angeles County. We understand Southern California consumer markets and have relationships with judges and opposing counsel.

No Damage Limits

Unlike attorneys who work on hourly rates and cap recoveries, we’re incentivized to maximize your damages. If your case can recover treble damages or punitive damages, we pursue them.

Los Angeles & California Consumer Protection Agencies

If you’ve been harmed by a consumer fraud, you can also file complaints with these agencies (in addition to hiring an attorney for private recovery):

California Attorney General — Consumer Protection Section

Website: oag.ca.gov/consumer

Investigates and prosecutes unfair competition, false advertising, and consumer protection violations. File a complaint through their online form.

Los Angeles County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs (DCBA)

Address: 500 W. Temple St., Room B-96, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 974-1452
Website: dcba.lacounty.gov

Handles consumer complaints, licensing disputes, and mediation. Faster response than state AG for local issues.

Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Website: reportfraud.ftc.gov
Phone: 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357)

Federal agency handling identity theft, robocalls (TCPA complaints), deceptive practices, and telemarketing violations. Report robocalls at FTC Spam Text page.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)

Website: consumerfinance.gov/complaint
Phone: 1-855-411-2372

Federal agency for credit reporting, debt collection, fair lending, and financial services complaints. Handles FCRA and FDCPA enforcement.

California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI)

Website: dfpi.ca.gov
Address: 2101 Arena Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95834

California’s financial services regulator. Handles complaints about debt collectors, lenders, and financial service providers licensed in California.

Filing with agencies does not prevent you from suing: You can file agency complaints and simultaneously hire an attorney to pursue private recovery. Agency investigations can take months or years; a private lawsuit (especially class actions) often recovers faster.

Frequently Asked Questions: Consumer Rights in Los Angeles & California

What consumer protection laws apply in California?

California has several powerful consumer protection statutes beyond federal law:
  • Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) — covers deceptive practices with treble damages and no damage caps
  • Unfair Competition Law (UCL) — extremely broad statute covering unlawful or unfair business practices
  • False Advertising Law (FAL) — targets false or misleading advertising
  • Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act — applies to all debt collectors, including original creditors (broader than federal FDCPA)
  • Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act — stricter than federal FCRA with no damage caps
  • Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Lemon Law) — nation’s strongest vehicle warranty protection
California law is significantly stronger than federal law in most areas.

Can I sue a debt collector in Los Angeles?

Yes. You can sue under both federal law (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692) and California law (Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Civil Code § 1788). California law is often stronger because it applies to original creditors who collect their own debts—federal FDCPA applies only to third-party collectors. Common violations include calling before 8 a.m., after 9 p.m., threatening false legal consequences, contacting your employer, and failure to validate debt. You can recover up to $1,000 per FDCPA violation or $100–$1,000 per Rosenthal violation, plus actual damages and attorney fees.

How much can I recover for robocall violations in California?

The TCPA provides statutory damages of $500 per violation (or $1,500 per violation if willful). If you receive 10 robocalls, that’s $5,000–$15,000 in damages alone—before actual damages. If you receive 100 robocalls (not uncommon), potential recovery is $50,000–$150,000. California law (CLRA) allows treble damages on top of TCPA damages, multiplying recovery by three. In class actions, when thousands of consumers receive robocalls from the same source, settlements often exceed $1 million.

What is the California Lemon Law?

California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civil Code § 1790 et seq.) lets you return a defective vehicle for a refund or replacement if it cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts. A “reasonable number” is typically 2+ repair attempts for safety defects or 4+ for non-safety defects. If your vehicle is in the shop for 30+ days total within one year, you likely have a lemon law claim. The manufacturer must refund or replace your vehicle at no cost, and you recover attorney fees. Willful violations result in treble damages (2x purchase price). Used vehicles with remaining manufacturer warranty are also covered.

How long do I have to file a consumer protection claim in California?

Statutes of limitations vary:
  • CLRA/UCL/FAL: 4 years from date of harm (or 1 year from discovery if concealed)
  • TCPA: 2 years from discovery (up to 3 if willful violation)
  • FCRA/Credit Reporting: 2 years from discovery (up to 5 for willful violations)
  • Rosenthal Debt Collection: 2 years from discovery (up to 4 if willful)
  • Song-Beverly Lemon Law: Within 4 years of vehicle purchase (or while warranty is active)
Do not delay: Contact an attorney immediately if you suspect a violation. Waiting can result in claims being time-barred.

What makes the California Rosenthal Act different from the federal FDCPA?

The federal FDCPA (15 U.S.C. § 1692) applies only to third-party debt collectors. Original creditors who collect their own debts are exempt. California’s Rosenthal Act (Civil Code § 1788) applies to all debt collectors, including original creditors. This is huge: a bank, credit card company, or utility that collects its own debts violates the Rosenthal Act if it breaks the law, but might escape federal FDCPA liability. Additionally, Rosenthal provides $100–$1,000 per violation and allows treble damages if willful, while FDCPA caps statutory damages at $1,000 per lawsuit (not per violation). California’s law is objectively stronger for consumers.

Do I need a consumer rights attorney for my case?

Not always, but in most cases you should. Here’s why: (1) Consumer protection statutes are complex and require knowledge of TCPA, FCRA, FDCPA, CLRA, UCL, FAL, Rosenthal, and Song-Beverly—courts expect expert handling; (2) Most statutes include mandatory attorney fees, so the defendant pays our fees if you win—you have nothing to lose; (3) We work on contingency—no fee unless we win; (4) Individual claims are often too small for you to pursue alone, but collectively they’re valuable—we can aggregate claims into class actions; (5) Defendants have teams of lawyers and insurance—an individual negotiating alone will lose. A qualified consumer attorney levels the playing field.

What if a company refuses to fix my credit report after a dispute?

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681i) and California’s Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (Civil Code § 1785.1 et seq.), a credit reporting agency must investigate your dispute within 30 days and respond in writing. If the agency refuses to investigate or fails to remove inaccurate information, that’s a violation. You can sue for $100–$1,000 in statutory damages per violation, plus actual damages (higher interest rates, lost credit opportunities), punitive damages, and attorney fees. California courts do not cap FCRA damages and are aggressive about enforcing credit reporting rights. If credit errors are affecting your finances, we can force correction and recover compensation.

Protect Your Consumer Rights Today

Whether you’ve received illegal robocalls, discovered credit report errors, faced abusive debt collection, or been deceived by false advertising, you have legal options. We’ve recovered nearly $1 billion for California consumers. Our fee: contingency only (no fee unless we win).

Contact Us for a Free Case Evaluation

Call

323-973-2580

Los Angeles / Ventura County Office

Office Address

23586 Calabasas Rd., Suite 105
Calabasas, CA 91302

Free Consultation. We answer all phones directly. No retainers, no hourly fees. We represent consumers on contingency only.

Serving All of Los Angeles County

We serve consumers throughout Los Angeles County, including:

Los Angeles, West Hollywood, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Long Beach, Torrance, Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, El Segundo, Inglewood, Burbank, Glendale, Culver City, Studio City, Encino, Bel Air, Westwood, Brentwood, Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Calabasas, Agoura Hills, Thousand Oaks, Oxnard, Ventura, Camarillo, Moorpark, Simi Valley, Chatsworth, Canoga Park, Reseda, Van Nuys, Northridge, Sunland, Tujunga, and surrounding areas.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Verdict

November 2007 jury verdict against Honda for breach of warranty in Orange County Superior Court.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Lemon Law jury trial verdict against Honda in 2006. Plaintiff prevailed on claims that vehicle failed to conform to warranty after reasonable repair attempts.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

August 4, 2005 jury verdict for breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended the appeal in this case.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Trial victory against Mercedes-Benz USA for Lemon Law violations and breach of express and implied warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended Mercedes’ subsequent appeal (B192382).

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.

More Details
$400,000–$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

Co-lead class counsel in consolidated Unfair Competition Law class action alleging HP covertly pushed a firmware update that prevented consumers’ printers from accepting third-party ink cartridges. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

FCRA class action for improper credit pulls (unauthorized hard inquiries). Certified under Rule 23 by contested motion and settled on a class-wide basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

PAGA settlement in wage and hour action on behalf of employees. Settlement approval granted.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.