A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Los Angeles Disability Discrimination Attorney

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Are you in need of a Disability Discrimination Attorney in Los Angeles?

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) stipulates that employers must provide “reasonable accommodations” for employees or potential employees grappling with physical or mental disabilities. The gray area lies within the definition of “reasonable accommodations,” as the act does not explicitly outline what these might be.

This ambiguity, although possibly well-intentioned, paves the way for potential discriminatory employment practices that could negatively impact competent individuals with disabilities. If you suspect that you may have been discriminated against in the workplace based on disability factors beyond your control, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Nationwide disability discrimination lawyer Todd M. Friedman, and his team of Los Angeles employment lawyers, can assist you in understanding your situation and defending your right to equality under the law.

What Are Some of the Nuances of Disability Laws?

While the exact parameters of “reasonable accommodation” under the ADA remain murky at best, certain aspects of the act are unequivocally clear. For instance, your disability cannot be used as grounds for discrimination in:

  • Pay
  • Training
  • Benefits
  • Hiring
  • Promotion
  • Termination

Navigating the job market can be challenging enough without the added burden of discrimination based on your disability. If you suspect that an employer is dismissing your capabilities for reasons unrelated to your competence to perform the job, reach out to our office to explore your rights.

Under the umbrella of California Worker’s Compensation laws, you have additional protections. Designed to support workers who suffer injuries or fall ill due to their employment, these laws can facilitate access to medical care, temporary or permanent disability benefits, and supplemental job displacement benefits.

Disability Assessment and Benefits

In California, when a doctor determines that your work-related injury or illness has stabilized and no substantial improvement is expected, you may undergo an assessment for a disability rating. This rating is a percentage that estimates how much your injury or illness restricts your ability to work. It is based on guidelines provided by the American Medical Association and specific factors related to your job.

Typical disabilities that might inhibit a person’s ability to work include severe back and spine injuries, significant traumatic injuries like those resulting from falls or machinery accidents, chronic illnesses such as job-related heart disease or cancer, and mental health conditions such as PTSD or severe depression, particularly if they were incited by work-related incidents.

The weekly benefits for permanent disability are calculated based on your disability rating, your wages at the time of injury, and the date of injury. The duration of these benefits varies and can extend up to a lifetime pension for total disability, depending on your disability rating.

Evaluating your Claim

It might be challenging to ascertain if your claim of disability discrimination is valid. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., you can engage directly with your attorney, facilitating a more efficient resolution and mitigating uncertainty.

Trust your instincts and act today. Contact our nationwide disability discrimination law practice toll-free to consult with attorney Todd M. Friedman about your potential options. Alternatively, you can email our office or call us to schedule a complimentary initial consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.