A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Business Litigation

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Business and Commercial Litigation Lawyers in Southern California

Owning a business can be one of life’s most rewarding pursuits. When things go well, you feel on top of the world. But when a dispute arises, your stress levels go up as uncertainty falls over the company. Whether it comes from outside your company or from within, serious conflict can threaten the profitability and even the existence of your business. That is why a relationship with a proven business litigation attorney is invaluable to any business owner.

Based in Southern California, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. serves business owners in several states around the country. We are known for our ability to get positive results while always being mindful of controlling costs as much as possible. Our attorneys are deeply connected to the local business communities in which we operate, and we are proud to help business owners weather the storms caused by serious business disputes. Reach out today to discuss litigation involving your business.

Powerful Representation in a Wide Range of Business and Commercial Disputes

Our seasoned business attorneys have successfully handled major litigation involving many different aspects of commercial activity for companies of all sizes. Examples of issues we handle include:

  • Breach of contract ꟷ Whether you need to sue for breach of contract or defend your company against allegations of a breach, we will aggressively protect your interests.
  • Real estate disputes ꟷ We are skilled in all aspects of landlord/tenant law, construction litigation and zoning/boundary issues.
  • Labor and employment issues ꟷ Rely on us to represent you in cases involving wage and hour disputes, wrongful discharges, employment discrimination, sexual harassment, unfair competition and many other employment law issues.
  • Partnership disputes ꟷ We resolve shareholder disputes, breach of fiduciary duty, misallocation of company funds, embezzlement, leaking of trade secrets and many other conflicts among partners.
  •  Insurance litigation ꟷ We handle claim denials, underpayment of claims, accusations that you lack proper insurance coverage and any other insurance-related issues.
  • Business torts ꟷ We’ll protect your rights against allegations of fraud, defamation, unfair competition, interference with business relationships and more.
  • Intellectual property ꟷ We know how to resolve copyright infringement and trademark infringement issues efficiently and effectively.
  • Business dissolution ꟷ Whether you and your partners have agreed to end the business or instead you’ve reached a crossroads that can’t be overcome, we can help you protect your interests during the dissolution process.

Tailoring Our Approach to the Needs of Your Business

At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. we are known as excellent negotiators with the proven ability to resolve issues via settlement, mediation or arbitration. Our attorneys are also highly skilled litigators who are always prepared to take a case to trial. We will work with you to resolve your business dispute in the manner than best protects you and your company.

Contact Our Southern California Business Dispute Lawyers 

Find out what your options are if your business is threatened by conflict. Call the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. at 1-877-619-8966 or contact us online to schedule an initial consultation. Our attorneys are prepared to evaluate the situation and provide guidance. Our main office is in Southern California and we have additional offices in Illinois, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.