A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Ohio Consumer Rights Law

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Ohio Consumer Rights Law

Do you believe your rights as a consumer have been violated in Ohio? Various state and federal laws protect you. Having an attorney who understands how consumer protection laws apply to Ohio residents is imperative to getting the legal counsel you deserve.

Serving Consumer Rights Clients Throughout Ohio

The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman provides services to residents throughout Ohio and nationwide. Whether you live in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Toledo or elsewhere in Ohio, we have extensive experience with legal issues in your area. One of our dedicated attorneys, David B. Levin, is a native of Ohio and is licensed to practice in Ohio, Illinois and West Virginia. Local knowledge of court systems and judges can be an advantage for your consumer fraud case.

For more information about our legal services in your state, we encourage you to call us at our Cleveland, Ohio, law office at . When we say we provide nationwide service, we mean it. This includes having a lawyer who is readily available to help you in Ohio.

Consumer Rights Practice Serving Ohio

Our law office in Ohio handles all types of consumer rights issues from
false advertising to breach of warranty claims. In addition, we handle cases related to:

These are just some of the consumer rights issues we can handle on behalf of Ohio residents. Our goal is to help you understand your rights and how to assert them and how the law applies to your situation.

Contact Us Today In Ohio

We invite you to schedule your free initial consultation with one of our attorneys today. Whether you are interested in a consumer protection or class action case, we can help you.

Contact us online to reach our Cleveland, Ohio, law office.

Ohio Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.