A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Robocall Harassment

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Consumers Are Protected From Robocalls

Few telemarketing calls are more annoying than robocalls, which use a computerized autodialer to deliver a prerecorded message. These calls may also be illegal.

If you are receiving robocalls from a telemarketer, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman in Calabasas can help. Not only can we stop the calls, but we may also be able to obtain compensation for you from the telemarketer. Call to discuss your case with one of our attorneys. We serve consumers in Los Angeles and throughout the nation.

When Are Robocalls Illegal?

Robocalls are regulated both under California law and a federal law known as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The following telemarketer actions are illegal under federal law:

  • Solicitations to residences using an artificial voice or a recording
  • Calling a cellphone using automated telephone equipment or an artificial or prerecorded voice
  • Failing to maintain a “do-not-call” list of consumers who ask not to be called
  • Failing to honor the National Do Not Call Registry

California bans robocalls unless there is an existing relationship between you and the caller. The following regulations apply:

  • A person must come on the line before the artificial or prerecorded voice to identify the nature of the call and the organization.
  • You must consent to the recording being played.
  • The robocaller must disconnect as soon as the prerecorded message is over or you hang up.

If the organization making the prerecorded call violated state or federal law, our lawyers can file a lawsuit and seek compensation on your behalf. Our fees will be paid by the organization making the calls.

If you’re not sure you have a case, talk with our lawyers. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., you will speak
directly with an attorney from our firm. We will provide you with timely case analysis and a smart strategy. This direct attorney contact saves our clients time and minimizes stress and uncertainty.

Contact Our Attorneys For Robocall Harassment Help Nationwide

For a free case evaluation, call or complete our simple contact form.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Verdict

November 2007 jury verdict against Honda for breach of warranty in Orange County Superior Court.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Lemon Law jury trial verdict against Honda in 2006. Plaintiff prevailed on claims that vehicle failed to conform to warranty after reasonable repair attempts.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

August 4, 2005 jury verdict for breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended the appeal in this case.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Trial victory against Mercedes-Benz USA for Lemon Law violations and breach of express and implied warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended Mercedes’ subsequent appeal (B192382).

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.

More Details
$400,000–$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

Co-lead class counsel in consolidated Unfair Competition Law class action alleging HP covertly pushed a firmware update that prevented consumers’ printers from accepting third-party ink cartridges. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

FCRA class action for improper credit pulls (unauthorized hard inquiries). Certified under Rule 23 by contested motion and settled on a class-wide basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

PAGA settlement in wage and hour action on behalf of employees. Settlement approval granted.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.