California has laws imposing penalties on businesses that try to deceive consumers or other companies through unfair practices such as false claims regarding products or services. False advertising laws are designed to protect the consumers, such as yourself.

Below are descriptions of the these laws.

  • Any type of deceptive advertising that causes a loss of revenue for any competitor is prohibited
  • Businesses deceiving consumers by advertising a product, property, or service in a false or deceptive manner is also prohibited

While, it is common for advertisers and competitors in the same industry to all claim to be able to provide “the best” services or products, simply saying they are “the best” is not prohibited.  As statements like “best product” are considered to be a personal opinion,  not a fact, so there are stipulations to the law that do allow for this type of competitive advertising.

However, when an advertisement goes a step beyond being competitive and is designed to deceive consumers into purchasing a service or product that is not what is promised, then it  becomes a problem. In such instances, legal actions may be brought by an injured consumers and also, in some cases, by business competitors to recover lost revenue or payment.

An example of when advertising is considered deceptive rather than just competitive is the class action lawsuit presently being filed against Kia and Hyundai for false inflating mileage.  With the high cost of gas many consumers are making their car buying decisions based on mpg.  Not only does it hurt the consumer when they decide to buy a Hyundai over a competitor because they believe they will get better gas savings, but it also hurts the competitor that has posted it’s correct mpg which may show a less desirable mpg than the inflated mpg that Hyundai deceptively posted.

If you have been a victim of false advertising at the hands of Kia, Hyundai or another auto maker please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898.

 


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...