A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Major business facing sexual harassment lawsuits

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
In recent years, employees are finding the courage to file lawsuits against the employers who have either allowed sexual harassment to occur, or have been the source of it. Filing a lawsuit against billion-dollar corporations is no minor feat. Despite this, many people are still filing lawsuits. Some companies are receiving lawsuits in different states, like Michigan and Florida. When repeated occurrences like this happen in multiple locations, it can feel like there is something in the water that is creating these environments.

Workplace culture needs responsibility

Sexual harassment can take many forms. It can appear through verbal comments, suggestions or solicitations. It can also appear as unwanted or repetitive physical contact. When an employee or employer is sexually harassing another employee, the company must take action to stop this behavior in its tracks. When an employer turns a blind eye to this behavior, they are cultivating a toxic environment that is unsafe for anyone to work in. This kind of systemic sexual harassment and discrimination can make it impossible for any kind of workplace civility. Employees should not have to be afraid for their safety in the workplace. This is where the purpose of these lawsuits come in. A sexual harassment lawsuit is not meant to be a cheap cash-grab. The purpose of these lawsuits is to send a message to all sexual harassers and the companies that are complicit to their actions that this behavior will no longer be anyone.

Employees are fighting back

It used to seem like a pipe dream to be able to hold massive worldwide corporations accountable for creating toxic workplace environments. With each passing day, that dream becomes more of a reality. When employees take legal action to hold sexual harassers and their employers accountable, they are creating a safer workplace for their peers.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.