Several former commissioned employees, including Edward LaMonica, Ashley LaMonica, Lara Harrison, have filed a lawsuit against their employer, RMCN Credit Services, Inc a credit repair business, for failing to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

According to the plaintiffs they worked in excess of 40 hours per week while employed by the defendants, but were not paid overtime.

The FLSA establishes minimum wage,  overtime pay, record keeping, and standards affecting employees in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments.  According to the FLSA nonexempt employees are entitled to a minimum wage and an overtime pay at a rate not less than 1 1/2 times the regular rate of pay after 40 hours of work in a workweek.

    • FLSA Minimum Wage: The federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour effective July 24, 2009. Many states, such as California have their own minimum  laws.    In cases where an employee is subject to both state and federal minimum  wage laws, the employee is entitled to the higher minimum wage, which in California is currently $8.00

 

    • FLSA Overtime:       Covered nonexempt employees must receive overtime pay for hours worked over 40 per workweek at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay. There is no limit on the number of hours  employees 16 years or older may work in any workweek.

 

If your employer owes you overtime pay or has violated other Federal or California Labor Laws, please give Los Angeles Employment Attorney Todd M. Friedman, P.C.. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...