If a debt collector is harassing you to make a payment, you may decide to give them a post-dated check to get rid of them because you are expecting to get the money soon.  Often times, the debt collector will promise not to deposit it right-away in the hopes that you will send them a check.

By law, a debt collector is allowed to ask you to write a post-dated check. However, if the debt collector cashes the check early, which happens often, whether on accident or purposely, you will have a problem to deal with. Although, banks aren’t supposed to put checks through before the date that is written on them, it happens all the time.  In addition to the problem of the check being deposited early, some debt collectors will use the information on the check to withdraw additional money from your account. They will also have information about your checking account to use later if they sue you.

You shouldn’t give a check to anyone,  knowing that you don’t have enough money in your account to cover it.  If you do bounce a check and can’t cover it, you may be facing criminal and/or civil penalties.  As well as, your bank will charge you for that check and any other checks that bounce later and those fees can be very expensive.  For example, there is one large, well known bank that charges $35 per overdraft.  That can quickly add up!

However, If a debt collector has deposited your post-dated check early, you may not be out of luck, you may have a cause of action under a federal law called the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The FDCPA says that it’s illegal for a debt collector to take a check that is postdated by more than 5 days, unless the consumer is notified in writing of the debt collector’s intent to deposit the check between 10 and 3 days prior to the deposit. If the debt collector takes a check that’s postdated by more than 5 days, and gives no notification before cashing it, the collector may be in violation.  If this has happened to you call (877) 449-8898.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...