Allied Interstate Inc., has agreed to pay a record-breaking $1.75 million to settle a lawsuit with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). In a recent press release, a FTC spokesperson focused on Allied’s alleged attempts to illegally collect debts from consumers that did not owe them money. “Debt collectors had better make sure their information is accurate, or they could end up paying a big penalty,” said David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

The FTC lawsuit accuses Allied Interstate of several Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) violations, including:
?continuing to contact consumers even after being informed by them that they did not owe the debt to Allied
? placing numerous illegal collection calls to 3rd parties
?placing multiple collection calls over a short period of time
?using abusive and/or profane language during collection calls to consumers
?revealing the details of a consumer’s debt to 3rd parties
?falsely threatening to sue consumers without any intention of actually doing so.

The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) was designed to combat abusive and deceptive practices committed by 3rd party debt collectors against consumers. It grants consumers the right to sue debt collectors for a violation of the FDCPA.

The amount of damages that a consumer may potentially recover under the FDCPA will depend upon the seriousness of the violation and the number of violations. Debt collectors routinely settle FDCPA claims involving technical violations of the Act for $1,000 plus attorney fees. As a general rule, the worse the conduct of a debt collector the higher the potential damages under the FDCPA.

Under the FDCPA a consumer may sue the debt collector for statutory damages, attorney fees and actual damages.

If you are being harassed by debt collectors in violation of the FDCPA, you may be entitled to compensation. Please call California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...