A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

A text message marketing company investigated by the FTC for allegedly sending millions of illegal spam text messages

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

A text message marketing company investigated by the FTC for allegedly sending millions of illegal spam text messages to consumers is banned from sending any unsolicited text messages, under a settlement agreement entered by a federal court.

According to the FTC millions of text messages were sent pitching mortgage modification services to consumers and instructing them visit various websites advertised in the messages, including Loanmod-gov.net,  which claimed to provide “Official Home Loan Modification and Audit Assistance Information,” and displayed a photo of an American flag.

The FTC alleged that the defendant collected information from consumers who responded to the text messages, including those who responded by asking to be removed from his list and sold it to 3rd parties, claiming the consumers were “debt settlement leads.”

The settlement imposes a judgment of $58,946.90 against the defendant Phil Flora. Based on sworn financial representations of financial hardship made by Flora, the judgment will be satisfied if he pays just $32,000. If it is determined that the financial information he gave the FTC was not true, the full amount of the judgment will become due.

If you have been the victim of unsolicited text messages, you may be entitled to compensation, per the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).   Please call Los Angeles Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898

 

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.