A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

California restaurants settle sexual harassment, pregnancy discrimination lawsuits

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

One business that recently resolved an employment law dispute is north of Los Angeles and the other that resolved a dispute is south of us. Both California businesses recently agreed to settle lawsuits that alleged inappropriate workplace behaviors.

The restaurant north of L.A. agreed to $175,000 to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed on behalf of both female and male kitchen staff. A fine-dining Italian restaurant about a two-hour drive south settled a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit and agreed to provide employee training and other measures to ensure an end to the prohibited workplace behavior.

The Italian restaurant just north of San Diego was sued by a woman who stated that the eatery cut her hours, and thereby dramatically reduced her income, because she was pregnant. Even after she gave birth, the restaurant refused to return her to previous server position – and then fired her.

She accused the restaurant of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

The former server will not only receive the financial compensation, but the settlement includes an agreement by the restaurant to revise its polices and procedures and to train its employees about pregnancy-related leave, discrimination and worker rights.

In the case to our north, a male cook at a Carmel restaurant said his private parts were repeatedly grabbed kitchen manager, chef and cook. When he complained about the behavior, he was told by a supervisor that “they only play.”

After the employee complained, the chef yelled and hit him, forcing him to quit his job.

A woman who worked as a dishwasher at a restaurant owned by the same parent company said she sexually harassed daily by the same kitchen manager who had harassed the male cook. She said she was also sometimes subjected to unwanted touching by the manager.

She also complained about the inappropriate behavior, but the harassment continued regardless.

The parent company will pay the two $175,000 and provide training at both eateries to prevent future harassment.

All three of these workers stood up for their rights and dignity. With the help of an attorney experienced in employment law litigation, you can, too.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.