A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Cavalry Portfolio Service was sued for alleged FDCPA violations

Categories:

According to the victim he had leased a car in 1996 and completed the lease payments as scheduled in 1999.  Neither the bank nor the dealership ever told him that he owed any additional money for the lease.

His lawsuit alleges that when he received a letter from Cavalry Portfolio Services, he promptly requested a copies of statements showing that there was an outstanding balance for the lease.  However, instead of validating the debt, Cavalry Portfolio Services violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by  suing the consumer.    After he was served he sent a 2nd request for validation of the debt pursuant to the FDCPA.  Cavalry Portfolio Services, then attempted to validate the debt by mailing the consumer a copy of the lease without any documents supporting an outstanding balance owed.

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) requires debt collectors to validate a debt if the consumer disputes that they owe any money.

The consumer wisely exercised his rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by sending the collection agency a validation letter in writing.

Assuming the facts alleged in the consumer’s FDCPA lawsuit are true, Cavalry Portfolio Services violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by failing to validate the alleged debt before it filed the lawsuit against the consumer.

If you have been harassed by a debt collector in violation of the FDCPA, you may be entitled to compensation.  Please give Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: April 6, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

Debt Collection Harassment: Know Your Rights Under the FDCPA and California Law

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Debt collectors frequently cross legal lines in their pursuit of payment, subjecting California consumers to harassment, deception, and abuse. ...

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Robocall and Telemarketing Violations: How to Stop Unwanted Calls and Get Compensation

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Illegal robocalls and unwanted telemarketing remain among the most common consumer complaints despite federal and state laws prohibiting these ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways California’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat deceptive and unfair business practices. Understanding these protections ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a close-up of a product

Ninth Circuit Affirms Class Action Against J&J Over “Oil-Free” Deception—Todd M. Friedman P.C. Leads the Fight

When a label says “oil-free,” consumers deserve to trust it. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we hold corporations accountable when ...