According to the victim he had leased a car in 1996 and completed the lease payments as scheduled in 1999.  Neither the bank nor the dealership ever told him that he owed any additional money for the lease.

His lawsuit alleges that when he received a letter from Cavalry Portfolio Services, he promptly requested a copies of statements showing that there was an outstanding balance for the lease.  However, instead of validating the debt, Cavalry Portfolio Services violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by  suing the consumer.    After he was served he sent a 2nd request for validation of the debt pursuant to the FDCPA.  Cavalry Portfolio Services, then attempted to validate the debt by mailing the consumer a copy of the lease without any documents supporting an outstanding balance owed.

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) requires debt collectors to validate a debt if the consumer disputes that they owe any money.

The consumer wisely exercised his rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by sending the collection agency a validation letter in writing.

Assuming the facts alleged in the consumer’s FDCPA lawsuit are true, Cavalry Portfolio Services violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by failing to validate the alleged debt before it filed the lawsuit against the consumer.

If you have been harassed by a debt collector in violation of the FDCPA, you may be entitled to compensation.  Please give Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...