A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

EEOC settles ADA employment discrimination complaint

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission handles the prosecution of employment discrimination matters under federal law in California and nationwide. A state agency in each state handles similar matters, generally under the anti-discrimination law of that state.  In most complaints filed before the EEOC, the complainant is represented by an experienced employment litigation attorney. In some instances, the EEOC investigates and brings its own employment discrimination complaints in larger cases or where it wants to establish  a certain principle of employment law.

The EEOC recently reached a settlement with P.H. Glatfelter Co. for $180,000 on behalf of persons with disabilities who sought forklift operator jobs. The consent decree was approved by a federal district court judge. The complaint had been filed against the paper manufacturing company in September.

The Americans with Disabilities Act is the main federal law that protects the rights of disabled persons to be free from discrimination in the workplace. The company imposed “overbroad” physical qualifications on applicants for forklift jobs, according to the EEOC. The company has also agreed in the settlement to initiate a new protocol for interviewing and hiring forklift operators that will not be discriminatory. Under the ADA, an employer must provide “reasonable accommodations” to a worker with disabilities so that he or she can perform the job.

If the person can perform the job duties properly with the assistance of reasonable accommodations, the employer cannot discriminate against the applicant. The same applies with respect to promotions, transfers, termination and all other terms of employment. The settlement pertained to two particular applicants for forklift jobs. The two will split the monetary recovery.

In one case, the company rejected the man because he had only one functioning eye, even though he had many years of prior forklift experience. One of the terms of the settlement was that the company agreed to not practice employment discrimination, and not conduct any impermissible medical examinations of job prospects. It agreed to evaluate each person individually and provide reasonable accommodations if necessary. Furthermore, supervisors at the plant in question must undergo training on federal anti-discrimination laws. These standards apply in California as well as in every other state. 

Source: pennlive.com, “P.H. Glatfelter Co. reaches $180K deal to end federal disability discrimination case“, Matt Miller, Jan. 26, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.