A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Employment discrimination claim filed in federal district court

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Wrongful termination cases dealing with alleged discrimination follow similar legal precepts and holdings nationwide, including in California. That is because employment discrimination cases are brought mainly under uniform federal statutes in federal district courts. In those cases where plaintiffs choose to proceed in a state forum, the state laws and legal principles are similar to federal law.

One case in another state that was recently filed in a federal district court is similar to a typical individual claim of discrimination that is filed in the federal and state courts in California. A man working for a moving company for 13 years found it necessary to miss several weeks of work after being rear-ended in an auto accident, according to the complaint. When he returned to work, the employer made its displeasure apparent by not scheduling him and then sent him a letter of termination a few weeks later.

The man is asserting a claim of racial discrimination and also a count for violation by the employer of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). FMLA entitles a person to a certain number of days off without pay under circumstances such as an extended illness. An employer may not discriminate for the employee’s choice to take qualified leave under the Act. An employer must cooperate with the employee in an FMLA situation and must send the appropriate forms to be filled out.

With respect to the man’s claim of racial discrimination, he will have to present evidence that he and persons of his race were discriminated against in favor of persons of another race. While this may be difficult to prove in some instances, there are many evidentiary routes to follow for the uncovering of evidence against the employer’s possible discriminatory practices. An employee in California who is encountering these kinds of problems at work will benefit by obtaining a consultation with an attorney who handles employment discrimination cases.

Source: pennrecord.com, “Mover sues company over allegations of discrimination and wrongful termination“, Annie Hunt, March 29, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.