I hope you kept your gift receipt!   A class action lawsuit has been filed against Macy’s Inc., alleging that they fraudulently advertised and sold gold-plated jewelry as “Fine Gold” in violation of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) standards.

The lawsuit was brought by plaintiff Natalya Barsukov, who on April 18, 2010,  purchased a pair of earrings from Macy’s that were labeled “Fine Gold.”  She was told the earrings were regularly priced at $360.00 but were currently priced at $129.09 due to a “pre-sale.”  Unfortunately, Natalya’s earrings began to exhibit signs of tarnishing and discoloration,  turning  from gold color to gray.   After taking the earings to an independent jeweler, she learned the earrings were not “Fine Gold”  at all,  but sterling silver covered with a microlayer of gold.

According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rules, the use of the word “Gold” or any abbreviation is prohibited to describe all or part of any product not composed completely of gold or a gold alloy.  The word “Gold” may be used to describe gold-plated items  if the description  “adequately identifies that the item is only surfaced-plated with gold”.

False advertising can be costly and frustrating, as well as embarrassing if you have given the item as a gift to a loved one thinking that you are giving them “fine gold”.

If you are the victim of false advertising please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...