The FTC is alleging that Instant Response Systems of Brooklyn New York used  deception, threats, and intimidation to  bully elderly consumers to pay for  medical alert systems they neither ordered.

According to the Federal Trade Commission, IRS’s telemarketers called elderly consumers using high pressure tactics in an attempt to get them to buy medical alert services and if they did not purchase the service, IRS would often times falsely claim the consumer had purchased it even if they had not.   The sales calls were followed by  repeated threats  of legal action in order to induce and coerce payment from the consumer.  In addition, the  FTC contends that Instant Response Systems has illegally made numerous unsolicited  calls to consumers whose phone numbers are listed on the National Do Not Call  Registry.

According  to the FTC’s complaint, consumers who tried to contact the company to dispute  the false charges would be berated with threats, verbal abuse, and demands that  they pay for the product.

Based  on this alleged conduct, the FTC charged the company and its principles with  making illegal misrepresentations to consumers, violating the Telemarketing  Sales Rule by calling phone numbers on the DNC Registry, and violating the Unordered Merchandise Statute by sending consumers pendants they did not order.

The  defendants charged in the case are Instant Response Systems, LLC, also doing  business as Response Systems, B.B. Mercantile, Ltd., Medical Alert Industrial,  and Medical Alert Services; and Jason Abraham, also known as Yaakov Abraham,  individually and as an officer of Instant Response Systems.

 

 


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...