As an employee you are protected by the  The Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), should you find yourself in situation where it is necessary to take medical leave. Both of these acts provide you the opportunity to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for certain “qualified” events.  Employers with 50 or more employees are covered by the FMLA and CFRA.  Employees who have worked for at least 12 months and at least 1,250 hours in the immediately preceding 12 months are covered by the laws.  This being said, employers do NOT need to provide you this the leave if they employees than 50 employees within a 75-mile radius.

If the employee is covered by the FMLA or CFRA the employee is entitled to return to his or her former position, or a position that is equivalent to the previous position held with equivalent benefits, pay, and conditions of employment.  As with most things, there is an exemption.  The exemption is for “key employees.”  A key employee is defined as a salaried employee who is the highest paid 10% of employees within a 75-mile radius.  If the key employee’s reinstatement would cause “substantial and grievous economic injury” to the employer, then the key employee may be denied reinstatement.  However, when the employee takes the leave of absence, the employer MUST provide notice to the employee that he or she is a “key employee” and explain their reinstatement rights.  If the employer fails to do so at the time the employee goes on the leave of absence, the employer loses the ability to deny reinstatement to the employee under the “key employee” exception.

If you were wrongfully terminated after taking a FMLA or CFRA protected leave of absence please give my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call today at (877) 449-8898


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...