A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Is that amazing online vacation rate for real? Probably not.

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Many of us use third-party booking websites to secure the accommodations for vacation and work-related travel. The fact that there are so many of these websites shows how popular this option is for American travelers. These sites often combine airfare, car rentals and hotel accommodations, and they often offer special discounted rates.

The problem with these sites is that they often don’t deliver on their promise. It is not uncommon for these sites to sell a discounted rate and then turn around and refuse to honor it.

When Third-Party Vacation Sites Renege

Our own attorney Todd M. Friedman was interviewed as part of a recent story in NBC Los Angeles. Three Los Angeles sisters obtained a vacation deal from booking.com, but 11 days later the website informed them that they would not honor the original deal at the posted rate.

The travel site would not honor the original deal, but offered them a new rate that was nearly three times higher.

How Can Travel Sites Get Away With This?

Basically, the booking site is a third-party which is not ultimately responsible for the actual stay in the actual hotel (or actual flight, etc.).

These sites can easily push the problem onto the organizations like hotels and airlines that have to actually fulfill the terms of the deal.

What Is the Big Deal?

In addition to sowing distrust in the marketplace, these misdealings cause tremendous cost for the individual consumers they are defrauding. The sisters in our news story, for example, spent considerable time and money to secure the other aspects of their vacation, including airfare and babysitting, because they counted on the agreement they had made with booking.com.

What Can I Do if This Has Happened to Me?

The first thing you should do is contact an experienced attorney. Do not delete any emails or communications involving the vacation plans. With the skills of a consumer rights lawyer, you could obtain compensation for your expenses or have the original agreement honored.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.