A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Is Your Employer A Bully?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Bullying is not a behavior that is restricted to the school yard.  It can also happen in the office by adults that should know better.  Workplace bullying includes tactics such as verbal, nonverbal, psychological, physical abuse and humiliation. It is described by experts as, “systematic aggressive communication, manipulation of work, and acts aimed at humiliating or degrading one or more individual that create an unhealthy and unprofessional power imbalance between bully and the victim.”

Workplace bullying may include: Threats to professional status, including belittling opinions, public professional humiliation, accusations regarding lack of effort, intimidating use of discipline or competence procedures Threat to personal standing, including undermining personal integrity, destructive innuendo and sarcasm, making inappropriate jokes about the victim, persistent teasing, name calling, insults, intimidation Isolation  including preventing access to opportunities, physical or social isolation, withholding necessary information.

Research by the Workplace Bullying Institute, suggests that the following are the most common  tactics used by workplace bullies: Falsely accusing someone of “errors” not actually made. Non-verbal intimidation, including glaring and staring.  The silent treatment to “ice out” and separate from other employees. Starting destructive rumors or gossip about the victim.

Workplace bullying overlaps to some degree with incivility but tends to be more intense and typically involves more repeated acts rudeness.  Increasing incivility between in the work environment can result in bullying, but isolated acts of incivility are not conceptually bullying despite the apparent similarity in their form and content. In case of bullying, the intent of harm is less ambiguous, an unequal balance of power is more salient, and the victim of bullying feels threatened, vulnerable and unable to defend himself or herself against negative recurring actions

Workplace bullying can create a very hostile and stressful work environment.  If you are being victimized by your employer who is creating a hostile work environment for you and making it impossible to work efficiently please give my office a call, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman at (877) 449-8898

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.