A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Kevin Johnson denies sexual harassment claim

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson says that an internal investigation has vindicated him from accusations by a city employee that he sexually harassed her several times from late 2013 to mid-2014. The accuser, who recently has filed suit, says she was forced to turn down a promising new job to avoid being around Johnson.

The plaintiff formerly worked in the city manager’s office. According to her claim, the sexual harassment began in December 2013 when Johnson asked her to join him in his private library at City Hall. She says that Johnson gave her “an unwelcome and close hug,” fondled her torso and tried to kiss her. When she pushed away and told Johnson she was married, he allegedly proposed that they begin a sexual relationship.

The plaintiff says she declined, but that Johnson told her to think about it. He said he would come by her desk in a few weeks for an answer. Based on an article by the Los Angeles Times, it does not appear that such an encounter did not allegedly take place until July 2014, when Johnson accused the plaintiff of avoiding him.

A month later, the plaintiff claims, Johnson again approached her and asked her to show him her hands. She did so, and Johnson played with her thumbs, she says. She is seeking $200,000 in damages. Her suit says she took a job in another department to get away from Johnson, and that she had to decline a job “with higher pay and flexibility” to avoid encountering the mayor.

At a recent press conference, Johnson denied all the allegations. He said an internal investigation performed by the city, along with a review by outside counsel found no wrongdoing on his part.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.