A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Lawsuits claim automatic renewal charges are consumer fraud

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

A consumer problem exists in California and elsewhere over a questionable practice of websites that automatically charge a customer’s card for renewing a subscription to a service at the expiration of the membership period. It may be included somewhere in the fine print of the company’s terms and conditions that a service will automatically renew at the end of the term and the credit card charged appropriately. Nonetheless, that is not transparent enough for most consumers, and the practice has fueled the initiation of consumer fraud class actions against many automatic renewal practices.

The cases are being filed in a wide variety of contexts, and California has passed an automatic-renewal law to further specify situations that are considered unacceptable and anti-consumer in nature. The California law and others around the nation provide the consumer a certain level of protection. It is illegal for a company to use automatic renewal procedures without first obtaining express consent from a customer prior to charging the customer’s credit card.

Cases were filed in California against Spotify, Hulu, Dropbox, LifeLock and several other companies using aggressive renewal policies. All revenues collected by the company must be returned to customers under the demands of most of these lawsuits. Some of the class actions have been dismissed due to arbitration provisions in the company’s terms and conditions; these were sent to private arbitration pursuant to the terms and conditions.

The case against LifeLock was settled and court-approved in July 2015. All such cases seek to certify a class of customers who were charged automatically for renewals in violation of state laws and on the basis of consumer fraud allegations. The California ARL requires the company to disclose the automatic renewal terms and to obtain express consent from a customer before a charge can be made. It seems like a small sacrifice for a company to simply send specific notice requesting approval each time a subscription is about to expire. However, many companies have taken in tens of millions in renewal fees without providing disclosure, and they may turn out to be reluctant followers of the new laws being passed.

Source: computerworld.com, “Websites’ automatic renewal policies can lead to trouble“, Joshua Briones, Crystal Lopez and Lauren Miller, March 11, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.