A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Reinstating vs Redeeming Your Repossessed Vehicle

Categories:

Consumer have the right to  “reinstate” their car loan by paying all amounts past due, plus any applicable delinquency charges, collection and repossession costs. California consumers should be aware that a creditor can NOT deny the right to reinstate merely because the consumer is behind on his or her payments.   Consumers can also “redeem” the vehicle by paying the loan balance in full, plus any applicable delinquency charges, collection and repossession costs.  Reinstating the loan generally costs the consumer less than redeeming the vehicle.

There are some reasons that a California consumer can be denied the right to reinstate, such as:  The buyer has reinstated once before in a 12-month period or two times during the term of the contract;  The buyer or any other person liable on the contract intentionally provided false or misleading information of material importance on his or her credit application; The buyer, any other person liable on the contract, or any permissive user in possession of the motor vehicle, in order to avoid repossession has concealed the motor vehicle or removed it from California; The buyer, any other person liable on the contract, or any permissive user in possession of the motor vehicle, has committed or threatens to commit acts of destruction, or has failed to take care of the motor vehicle in a reasonable manner, so that the motor vehicle has become substantially impaired in value or may become substantially impaired in value; The buyer or any other person liable on the contract has committed, attempted to commit, or threatened to commit criminal acts of violence or bodily harm against an agent, employee, or officer of the creditor in connection with the creditor’s repossession of or attempt to repossess the motor vehicle; The buyer has knowingly used the motor vehicle, or has knowingly permitted it to be used, in connection with the commission of a criminal offense, other as a consequence of which the motor vehicle has been seized by a federal, state, or local agency;  The motor vehicle has been seized by a federal, state, or local public agency or authority pursuant to a law which essentially precludes the return of the vehicle to the buyer or any other person liable on the contract; It also is important to note that in any court action, the creditor (not the consumer) must prove that the denial of the right to reinstate was justified in that it was reasonable and made in good faith.

If you have been wrongfully allowed to reinstate your vehicle please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call today at (877) 449-8898.

Published: December 4, 2012

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

Debt Collection Harassment: Know Your Rights Under the FDCPA and California Law

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Debt collectors frequently cross legal lines in their pursuit of payment, subjecting California consumers to harassment, deception, and abuse. ...

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Robocall and Telemarketing Violations: How to Stop Unwanted Calls and Get Compensation

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Illegal robocalls and unwanted telemarketing remain among the most common consumer complaints despite federal and state laws prohibiting these ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways California’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat deceptive and unfair business practices. Understanding these protections ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a close-up of a product

Ninth Circuit Affirms Class Action Against J&J Over “Oil-Free” Deception—Todd M. Friedman P.C. Leads the Fight

When a label says “oil-free,” consumers deserve to trust it. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we hold corporations accountable when ...