According to the retaliation lawsuit, two bartenders were already engaged in a wage-and-hour lawsuit against Coyote Ugly alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) when the president and founder of Coyote Ugly posted an entry on her blog, mentioning the lawsuit and alleging that one of the employees  was fired for theft and added “f*** that b****.”

Additionally, a supervisor took it a step further and made a post to his Facebook page stating “Dear God, please don’t let me kill the girl that is suing me . . . . that is all . . . .” while allegedly sitting across the bar from the other employee.

Later that same night, the supervisor was told a customer had fallen and threatened to sue the company. The supervisor stated, “Why does everyone sue? I’m tired of all of these b****** taking their issues out on our company. They are f***ing idiots.”

Although the supervisor was facing another individual, his body was allegedly turned towards the employee, who was less than three feet away, while he made this statement.

The court found that the Facebook post, blog post and supervisor outburst could support the employees’ claims for retaliation for engaging in protected activity under the FLSA.

The original wage-and-hour  FLSA collective lawsuit was based on an allegedly illegal tip pool.   Bartenders were required to put all of the tips they earned during a shift into a pool.  The pool was then distributed among Coyote Ugly’s bartenders, barbacks, and security guards who worked that shift.

Tip pooling is a common practice, but when it is done improperly, it can be a major source of problems.  In this case, the employees claimed that the tip pool was unlawful because security guards, are not  typically “tipped employees,” participated in it.  The FLSA defines “tipped employees,” as those who “customarily and regularly receive tips,” such as waitresses and bartenders.

If your employer is violating California Labor Law and owes you money, please give Los Angeles Employment Attorney, Todd M. Friedman, P.C.. Friedman for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...