A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Robo-Dial TCPA Case Against Best Buy

Categories:

On October 17, 2012, in the case Chesbro v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., the Court ruled that “robocalls” made by Best Buy to remind consumers to use their Best Buy “Reward Zone” points are telemarketing calls and are indeed subject to the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

Plaintiff Michael Chesbro bought a computer from Best Buy and claims he did not sign up for the Reward Zone program, but nonetheless, Best Buy made autodialed calls to his phone with pre-recorded messages about the Reward Zone program, including reminders to use his points before they expired, and to “inform” him about other changes in the program.  Best Buy continued to make robocalls to Mr. Chesbro  after he told Best Buy to stop calling him.

Best Buy argued that the auto-dialed calls to Mr. Chesbro and thousands of other consumers nationwide were “informational” calls and were not intended to entice consumers to shop at Best Buy.  The trial court agreed and dismissed Mr. Chesbro’s case.  However, Chesbro appealed, and the Ninth Circuit Court agreed with his position, stating “there was no other use for the Reward Zone points” than redeeming them with future Best Buy purchases,” the calls were telemarketing calls, not “informational” calls.

Read the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling  (Chesbro v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., 11-35784, 2012 WL 6700555 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2012)

If you are receiving unsolicited calls in violation of the TCPA you may be entitled to compensation.  If you are a California resident please give my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: January 22, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

Debt Collection Harassment: Know Your Rights Under the FDCPA and California Law

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Debt collectors frequently cross legal lines in their pursuit of payment, subjecting California consumers to harassment, deception, and abuse. ...

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Robocall and Telemarketing Violations: How to Stop Unwanted Calls and Get Compensation

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Illegal robocalls and unwanted telemarketing remain among the most common consumer complaints despite federal and state laws prohibiting these ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways California’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat deceptive and unfair business practices. Understanding these protections ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a close-up of a product

Ninth Circuit Affirms Class Action Against J&J Over “Oil-Free” Deception—Todd M. Friedman P.C. Leads the Fight

When a label says “oil-free,” consumers deserve to trust it. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we hold corporations accountable when ...