A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Rooting out racial discrimination in the workplace

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Most people are shocked when they experience discrimination or racial hatred in the workplace. In 2017, it should be expected and assumed that other employees and supervisors would not behave in such a manner, but it happens with some frequency. The challenge for many is to distinguish whether or not they have a valid legal claim of workplace discrimination. There is a distinction, to be sure, between one person behaving badly and a company establishing a system of discrimination. Multiple Suits Against Fox News Just on the heels of the Bill O’Reilly sexual harassment scandal, Fox News is facing two lawsuits alleging racial discrimination, according to a recent report in the New York Times online. According to the report, two black women recently filed a class action suit against 21st Century Fox for racial discrimination. In an interesting quote, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers said “When it comes to racial discrimination, 21st Century Fox has been operating as if it should be called 18th Century Fox.” Another employee filed a similar racial discrimination claim against 21st Century Fox. The Company Did Nothing In both of these legal claims, the plaintiffs allege that they complained of their experiences to higher levels of leadership and the company did not do anything to address or correct the situations. When one individual acts in ways that are racially offensive, there may or may not be a valid claim against the company, depending on a number of circumstances. But when complaints are made to management and nothing is done, it gives much more weight to these claims. If you have experienced racially charged language or discrimination in the workplace, the best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer. An attorney who has handled employment law cases can help you determine whether you have a claim and protect your rights in the workplace.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.