A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Silicon Valley gender discrimination suit captivates industry

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
A high-profile employment discrimination lawsuit has Silicon Valley businesses doing a lot of soul-searching, it appears. Whether this will lead to real changes in how female employees are treated in the tech field remains to be seen. Readers have probably heard of the suit, which has received a great deal of media coverage. The plaintiff, a former junior partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capital firm, sued the company for gender discrimination and wrongful termination. Trial ended on March 25, leaving it to the jury to deliberate. The plaintiff is one of many women in California’s tech industry who have said they are treated as inferior to their male colleagues. Complaints of unequal pay, lost promotions and a hostile “brogrammer” environment are common. In this case, the woman said, male colleagues would discuss pornography in her presence. One time, a partner sent her a book of “sexual poetry,” to use the Los Angeles Times’ description. Kleiner Perkins allegedly sent male employees, but no women, to a dinner with Al Gore. When the plaintiff asked why, she says, she was told that woman would “kill the buzz” at the event. She eventually complained about this behavior, and was fired. Her lawsuit accuses Kleiner Perkins of gender discrimination retaliation. She says she was not promoted and later fired as revenge for speaking up about discrimination at the firm. She is seeking lost wages and bonuses, plus punitive damages that could mean a verdict of as much as $160 million, if the jury sides with her. No matter the outcome of this case, observers say, it has caused many companies in the tech industry to examine how they treat their female employees. Perhaps this will give women more opportunities to work and advance in the industry, without having to deal with sexual harassment and discrimination.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.