A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Tips for reporting sexual harassment at work

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Reporting Sexual Harassment at WorkCalifornia has strong laws against sexual harassment in the workplace, but not all employers are adept at handling sexual harassment complaints. In an ideal situation, HR will interview the person making a complaint as well as the alleged harassers and any potential witnesses. HR should also follow up with the person who made the complaint after the investigation is complete. Employees who make a complaint should not expect to find out whether the harasser was disciplined since personnel actions must be kept confidential. With that said, it is acceptable for an employee to follow up with HR to see if an investigation was conducted.

HR can sometimes respond to complaints of sexual harassment with hostility, but a lack of action could also be a sign that HR is not adequately trained on how to handle such complaints. It can be helpful to go to HR armed with evidence of the harassing conduct. This could include text messages, emails or phone logs. Employees should also document any instances of harassment in a personal journal at the time they happen.

Individuals who experience sexual harassment should also be prepared to tell HR the location of where any alleged harassment occurred, who witnessed it, if anyone, and what happened. It may make someone nervous to reveal all of these details to HR, but making a report to HR can help other employees who may face the same harassment in the future.

Employees may be more comfortable reporting harassment to a supervisor instead of HR, but it is important to know that any supervisor will have an obligation to report the harassment to HR. If a supervisor or HR fails to take action in response to a harassment complaint, employees may want to speak with a plaintiff-side employment law attorney about their legal options.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.