A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Uber Class Action Lawsuits Reach Settlements

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Have you ever wondered if Uber drivers were considered employees of Uber? This is a question that was part of a major class action lawsuit in California and Massachusetts. Employee misclassification is an important issue because if an employee is misclassified, he or she could be missing out on health insurance, retirement and other employee benefits. This is exactly why Uber drivers in these class action lawsuits brought forth their claim. While Uber claimed that its drivers were independent contractors (in a general sense this means a worker who is not entitled to benefits), many drivers thought otherwise. Likely in an effort to stop the bleeding quickly, Uber settled both class action lawsuits in California and Massachusetts. The settlement agreement (with specific stipulations laid out) included a $100 million payout to 385,000 plaintiffs listed in the class action lawsuits. Some of the specifics of this agreement include allowing Uber drivers to have a sign saying tips are appreciated (not required) and setting up an appeals process for drivers who believe they are victims of wrongful termination.

Approved Settlement? Not So Fast

While an agreement has been reached, federal district courts for both lawsuits must approve the settlements. Hearings will be held in Boston and Oakland over the fairness of the settlements. After legal fees, even with the $100 million dollar price tag for Uber, most drivers will not see more than a few hundred dollars when the dust settles. This may leave room for another round of negotiations if the federal district court judges do not find the settlements appropriate and fair given the situation. For more information about class action lawsuits, reach out to a skilled lawyer in California.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.