A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

What federal laws prohibit job discrimination?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Employment laws provide a necessary structure in the workplace that both helps employers adhere to the law while also affording protections to employees. Although most people are not able to cite all of the laws at work for them, most people are able to recognize when an employer is in violation of the law and needs to be held accountable.

To help give titles to what most of our more frequent readers already know, we wanted to answer this week’s post title question by looking at the federal laws that prohibit discrimination in the workplace.

Civil Rights Act of 1964. Perhaps the most well know, this act prohibits an employer from discriminating against an employee based on sex, race, religion, national origin or color.

Civil Rights Act of 1991. This law works in relation to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and provides monetary compensation to employees who are found to have been the victim of discrimination.

The Equal Pay Act of 1963. An important addition to federal law, this act prohibits an employer from paying men and women differently even though they perform substantially equal work.

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. This law prohibits an employer from discriminating against an employee based on a disability. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, this also includes pregnancy, which can be considered a temporary disability depending on health complications that can arise.

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973. In addition to the ADA, this act provides protections against discrimination to individuals in the federal government who have disabilities.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. This law prohibits discrimination based on age and applies to individuals over the age of 40.

Although the EEOC can help with claims of job discrimination, so too can a skilled lawyer. With the help of an attorney, you’ll gain a better understanding of your rights and how best to handle your suspicion of discrimination in the workplace.

Source:  U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Federal Laws Prohibiting Job Discrimination Questions And Answers,” Accessed Dec. 12, 2014

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.