A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

You can not go to jail for being late on your credit card

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

A fairly common, yet illegal tactic of overly aggressive debt collectors is to threaten consumers with arrest if they do not pay their debt.  Some shady debt collectors have even go as far as to illegally impersonate a  police officer and claim to have  a warrant for the consumer’s arrest.   This tactic is illegal on a couple of different levels.  For one thing,  it is a felony to impersonate a police officer, but on the consumer level, it is a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) for a debt collector to lie or threaten consumer with arrest.  You cannot go to jail for not paying your debts. End of Story! Any debt collector that tells you differently has violated FDCPA.

FDCPA § 807.  False or misleading representations 


A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation in connection with the collection of any debt.  The following conduct is a violation of this section of the FDCPA:

(1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is affiliated with the United States or State government. including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof.

(2) The false representation of  the amount or  status of any debt.

(3) The false representation or implication that any individual is an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney.

(4) The representation or implication that nonpayment of any debt will result in the arrest or imprisonment of any person. Or the seizure, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or wages of any person unless such action is lawful and the debt collector or creditor intends to take such action.

(5) The threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken or that is not intended to be taken.

(6) The false implication that the consumer committed any crime or other conduct in order to disgrace the consumer.

(7) Communicating or threatening to communicate to any person credit information which is known or which should be known to be false, including the failure to communicate that a disputed debt is disputed.

(8) The use or distribution of any written communication which simulates or is falsely represented to be a document authorized, issued, or approved by any court, official, or agency of the United States or any State, or which creates a false impression as to its source, authorization, or approval.

(9) The use of any false representation or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a consumer.

(10) The false representation or implication that documents are legal process.

(11) The false representation or implication that a debt collector operates or is employed by a consumer reporting agency.

If you are being harassed by debt collectors, you may be entitled to compensation.  Document all  of the debt collectors’ communications. And if the debt collector does anything untrue, harassing, or  abusive, please contact California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.