A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Just because drivers can go faster doesn’t mean they should

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Like other states, California has in the past several decades increased its speed limits. Whereas it used to be that the fastest any motorist could travel even on the interstate was 55 miles per hour, nowadays, Californians may be allowed to drive at 65 or even 70 miles per hour without exceeding the speed limit. While some may see this as a good thing since it cuts down on travel time, these higher speed limits may actually be causing more traffic fatalities than would occur were speed limits a little lower. One study estimates that in 2017 alone, almost 2,000 people died in car accidents precisely because of higher speed limits. On the whole, over the last quarter of a century, an additional 37,000 people across the country died thanks to the trend toward allowing drivers to go faster. The same study concluded that even a modest increase in the posted speed limit, of 5 miles per hour, increases the rate of accident-related deaths. Specifically, on the highway, the fatality rate increases by 8 percent, and the rate increases by 3 percent among drivers who are traveling on other roads. The statistics fly in the face of an argument many have used to justify higher speed limits. Proponents had argued that higher speed limits merely acknowledge that people like to drive at those higher speeds and fell comfortable doing so. The reality, however, is that motorists will continue to exceed the posted speed limits, even if they are higher. In the meantime, it is becoming more and more apparent that drivers simply cannot handle their vehicles as safely at higher speeds as they can at lower speeds. Residents of Los Angeles should remember that just because they can go a certain speed, it does not mean that they should. In fact, drivers have an obligation to slow down whenever conditions are less than ideal for driving. If they do not meet this responsibility and if they cause an accident as a result, then speeding drivers can be held legally accountable.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.