A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Zillow settles sexual harassment suits against supervisors

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

When an established company is hit with a long string of gender discrimination and harassment lawsuits by current and former female employees, and settles the cases for a substantial sum, it is time for the culture of the company to be studied, purged and re-formulated into an ethical business operation. The online real estate agency, Zillow, has been on the receiving end of numerous sexual harassment lawsuits filed in 2014, apparently in federal courts located in California. The complaints generally all claimed that there was an environment of sexual harassment of women employees and agents in the company’s Irvine sales office.

An Orange County publication summed up the complaints as describing a “frat house” atmosphere, making it intolerable for women to work within the pressures of an alleged hostile work environment. Because the government usually allows employers to settle such cases without admitting wrongdoing, Zillow has agreed to pay the women but will not make any admissions of guilt. The amount of the settlements was not revealed.

The company stated a need for “closure” as the reason for settling. The allegations against Zillow included females being ranked by breast size, requests for sex, sexually explicit text messages, the texting of obscene photos and a pervasive environment of sexual dominance by male managers and bosses. Zillow admitted to some inappropriate problems but called the suits in general frivolous.

There were also lawsuits by black employees raising allegations of discriminatory treatment due to race. Another suit involved a whistleblower plaintiff who alleged that he was retaliated against for reporting a credit card scheme by co-workers. The sexual harassment and other lawsuits involved a variety of claims against supervisors and others at the Irvine office. Another lawsuit still pending in a California court is a class-action against Zillow for wage and hour claims on behalf of a large group of employees. This kind of a repetitive stream of litigation brought by employees seems to suggest a need for a managerial housecleaning and a company-wide invigoration of rules against employment discrimination.

Source: mpamag.com, “Zillow settles several suits alleging sexual harassment, discrimination“, Ryan Smith, June 7, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.