A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Consumer fraud lawsuits proliferate over “all natural” labels

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
The use of the term “all natural” appears widely on food labels on the super market shelves in California and nationwide. The term, however, is elusive to define and has been the center piece of numerous class action lawsuits for consumer fraud over the past several years. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration embarked on a process trying to define the term. It has to date received about 7,600 comments from consumers, companies and other interested entities. One area of great confusion raised by the all natural tag is that many consumers have been led to wrongly believe that the term means that there is no genetic engineering of organisms, and no hormones, pesticides or artificial ingredients. Due to the prior lack of involvement of the FDA in regulating the use of the term, consumers have been basically duped into attributing nonexistent benefits to their food products in the past. It has inflicted serious financial and other damages on consumers and others in the distribution path. In general, therefore, it is not correct for a consumer to rely on the term all natural in defining the state of cereals or other foods that are eaten to restore the drug. This fact has spawned over 100 class action suits against manufacturers for using the all natural label alongside genetically engineered food objects, and the inclusion of pesticides and artificial ingredients. It should be noted that consumers have a much better chance of picking out true natural foods through the organic label. Traditionally, the organic label has been regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That agency has prevented the use of the tag all natural when there are genetically modified foods in the food item. In general, however, a massive amount of foods under FDA regulation are comprised of genetic mutations created by applying radiation to the foods. The fear of getting involved in one of the many consumer fraud class actions that consumers have filed has actually caused some of the companies to stop using the all natural terminology in California and elsewhere. Source: The New York Times, “Is Your Food Natural? F.D.A. to Weigh In“, Anahad O’Connor, May 17, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.