A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

SiriusXM settles consumer fraud claims

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Digital radio giant SiriusXM has promised to repay customers affected by its fraudulent business practices, change its subscription cancellation policies and pay a $3.8 million fine to settle accusations filed by attorneys general in 44 states. The company had been accused of not cancelling subscriptions after promising customers they would do so.

A multistate investigation into SiriusXM’s business practices concluded that customers from about mid-2008 to the present routinely had a hard time cancelling their contracts. Many times, SiriusXM would tell customers that their contract was cancelled, but then renew it without notice or consent. The company would charge unauthorized fees, and jack up the price after a low introductory rate. These practices violated consumer protection laws, officials said.

The $3.8 million fine will go to the states. Customers who believe they were affected by the fraud can file a complaint to seek compensation. Their harm must have taken place between July 28, 2008 and Dec. 4 of this year, according to one of the attorneys general involved.

It would be nice to be able to trust large businesses to honor their contracts, and give customers what they say they will. But the fact is, some companies defraud their customers, which is why the law must keep their practices in check. One way the law does this is by allowing victims to take action by suing the company that defrauded them.

Of course, if a business rips off one person, it is highly likely that many people endured the same treatment. A class-action lawsuit may be the best way to obtain justice from a dishonest business.

Source: AZCentral.com, “SiriusXM fined $3.8 million in consumer fraud case,” Robert Anglen, Dec. 5, 2014

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.