A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Consumers be wary of these two coronavirus scams

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
billing counterMisinformation can spread quickly and there are some businesses who go too far to get an advantage in a competitive marketplace. In an effort to help better protect the public, the government has put together various regulations to reduce the risk of false claims and other unscrupulous business practices. The legal system also offers some refuge, allowing wronged consumers to hold the business accountable through a civil suit.

How common are these practices?

Unfortunately, such practices are not uncommon. Today consumers must be wary as some unscrupulous businesses attempt to take advantage of the fear and confusion caused by the current coronavirus pandemic.

What are examples of unscrupulous and illegal business practices?

Examples the government is currently investigating include:
  • False advertising. Consumers have reported businesses making false promises about the way their goods and services can protect against or combat the coronavirus. As a result, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) encouraged businesses to remember it is illegal to make false claims about their products and services. In some cases, the law also forbids businesses from making true statements about a product or service that misleads, deceives or confuses the public. The FTC has sent warning letters to some businesses making such misrepresentations.
  • Price gauging. It is also often illegal to increase the price of products in response to a state of emergency. Examples include medical devices, good, gas, hotel accommodations, building materials, transportation needs and other essential supplies. In California, state law makes it illegal to increase the price by 10 percent or more before the state of emergency.
Consumers who are the victims of these malicious acts can take a step further to hold the advertiser or business accountable for their wrongdoing. Civil claims may be available and can lead to financial awards to help the victim regain what was lost.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.