Although the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) applies to every state, not all states provide its residents additional protection from collectors like California. People living in California have an additional layer of consumer protection known as the California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.  Meaning, Californians are protected under two laws, both the federal law (FDCPA) and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Act. The most important difference between the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Act is that the Rosenthal Act provides consumers protection from first party creditors.

Unlike the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Act protects consumers from  harassment from BOTH third-party debt collectors and original creditors.

Example below:

The FDCPA protects you against the collection agency collecting for the original debtor (a bank, credit card, etc), but does not protect you against original debtor

California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Act protects you against both the original debtor (a bank, credit card, etc) and the collection agency.

If you are being harassed by rogue debt collectors please contact my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman at (877) 449-8898 for a free consultation to see if you might have a case.

 


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...