A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

What is the California Lemon Law

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The  California Lemon Law protects consumers who have purchased or leased a vehicle with major unfixable flaws. According to the California’s Department of Consumer Affairs:

• The Lemon Law applies to any problem that “substantially impairs the use, value or safety” of a car covered by a manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty, provided the problem is discovered within 18 months or 18,000 miles of purchase or lease. Even if you bought the car used, the lemon law applies to the vehicle if the original warranty is still in effect.

If the manufacturer cannot fix the problem, it must replace your car with a new one that is “substantially identical” or refund your money.  However,  the manufacturer can charge you for the mileage you’ve put on their flawed vehicle. If you’ve driven the car 6,000 miles, for example, the carmaker can deduct 5% of the original price before giving you a refund.  This being said, if you think you might have a Lemon Law case, limit the mileage that you put on the car.

• Manufacturers are allowed a “reasonable” number of repair attempts before a car is branded a lemon. In the case of potentially life-threatening problems, such as faulty brakes, the manufacturer only two tries to fix the problem.  Also, if the vehicle has been in the shop for more than 30 days  and is still not repaired you’re entitled to a replacement vehicle or refund.

•The dealer or manufacturer may argue that the problem was caused by your abuse or neglect of the vehicle, in which case the lemon law would not apply to your vehicle. The dealer may also contend that the problem is not covered by the warranty, or that it has not had enough opportunities to fix the problem. This is why it is important keep all repair and maintenance records for your vehicle.

If you are having problems with your new car give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898 and we will discuss with you if the Lemon Law applies to your vehicle.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.