Table of Contents
- What the FDCPA Prohibits
- California’s Rosenthal Act Protections
- Common Debt Collector Violations
- Your Right to Dispute Debts
- Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection
- Suing Debt Collectors for Violations
- Conclusion
Key Takeaways
- FDCPA prohibits harassment, false statements, and unfair practices by debt collectors
- California’s Rosenthal Act extends FDCPA protections to original creditors
- Debt collectors cannot call before 8am or after 9pm or contact you at work if prohibited
- You have 30 days to dispute a debt in writing after receiving validation notice
- Statutory damages up to $1,000 plus actual damages and attorney’s fees available
Debt collectors frequently cross legal lines in their pursuit of payment, subjecting California consumers to harassment, deception, and abuse. Understanding federal and state protections empowers consumers to stop illegal practices and recover damages. The consumer protection team at Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. has successfully represented thousands of consumers against abusive debt collectors.
What the FDCPA Prohibits
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prohibits debt collectors from engaging in harassment, false or misleading statements, and unfair practices. Violations include excessive calling, threats of violence, profane language, publishing names of debtors, and misrepresenting the amount owed.
California’s Rosenthal Act Protections
California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act extends FDCPA protections beyond third-party collectors to include original creditors collecting their own debts. This broader coverage means more collection activities fall under legal scrutiny.
Common Debt Collector Violations
Frequently observed violations include calling outside permitted hours (8am-9pm), contacting consumers at work after being told not to, discussing debts with third parties, threatening legal action the collector cannot take, and attempting to collect debts already beyond the statute of limitations.
Your Right to Dispute Debts
Within 30 days of receiving a debt validation notice, consumers can dispute the debt in writing. Once disputed, the collector must stop collection efforts until providing verification. Collectors who continue collecting unverified debts violate federal law.
Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection
California imposes time limits on debt collection lawsuits. Written contracts have a four-year limitation while oral agreements have two years. Collectors who threaten or file suit on time-barred debts may violate the FDCPA.
Suing Debt Collectors for Violations
Consumers can recover statutory damages up to $1,000 per lawsuit, actual damages for emotional distress or other harm, and attorney’s fees. Class actions may recover additional statutory damages up to $500,000 or one percent of the collector’s net worth.
Conclusion: Fight Back Against Abusive Debt Collectors
Debt collectors count on consumers not knowing their rights. They use intimidation, harassment, and illegal tactics hoping you’ll pay without question. But federal and California law give you powerful weapons to fight back—and you can recover compensation even if you actually owe the debt.
Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. has been at the forefront of consumer protection against abusive debt collection for years. We’ve sued countless debt collectors for FDCPA and Rosenthal Act violations, recovering statutory damages and stopping illegal practices. If debt collectors are harassing you with illegal calls, threatening lawsuits on time-barred debts, or using other abusive tactics, contact us today. We’ll put an end to the harassment and hold these collectors accountable for their violations. Call now for a free consultation.
