Debt Collectors, Luebke Baker and Associates have reached a proposed settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, (FTC) following charges that they illegally harassed consumers to pay for bogus magazine subscriptions.

According to the FTC, the  defendants knew, or should have known, that many of magazine debts were invalid.   The proposed settlement order, bars Luebke Baker and Associates, Inc., from representing that a consumer owes a debt without having a reasonable basis to do so. Additionally, it also requires the defendants to conduct a reasonable investigation when a consumer disputes a debt.  When the defendants attempt to collect debts, they must provide consumers with disclosures about their rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, (FDCPA).

Luebke Baker allegedly collected on debts for magazine subscriptions despite the fact that the FTC had successfully sued Cross Media Marketing (CMM)., the company that originally sold the magazine subscriptions for deceptive marketing.  The defendants were notified of a federal court order against CMM.  that placed special requirements on anyone attempting to collect payment for these magazine subscriptions.  However, the FTC  alleges that Luebke  ignored these requirements and repeatedly told consumers the debts were due and payable.

The proposed settlement imposes monetary judgments totaling $3.1 million – $2.3 million in civil penalties for Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violations, $730,000 in disgorgement for collecting Cross Media Marketing Corp. accounts in violation of the FTC Act.

If you have been the victim of  debt collector who are  violating the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act, you may be entitled to compensation.    Please give Los Angeles Debtors’ Attorney a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...