Debt Collection agency, National Credit Audit Corporation was accused of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (FDCPA) after one of its debt collectors allegedly misrepresented herself as an attorney to a debtor’s husband in an effort to intimidate them into paying an alleged debt.   After the call the debtor’s husband contacted National Credit Audit Corp’s main line and was told by the operator that the debt collector who called him was  NOT a lawyer.  The lawsuit further claims that National Credit Audit Corp. falsely threatened to file a lawsuit to attempt to collect a $ 2,118 balance.   The calls from National Credit Audit became so repetitive and harassing that the couple eventually had to change their phone number because of the collection agency’s frequent phone calls.

The complaint also alleged that, after the consumer asked the debt collector to stop calling him at work, the collector told him that if he did not call her back that afternoon, she would continue to call him at this job.

If the allegations above are correct than Credit Audit Corp made several FDCPA violations in this case.  Below are a list FDCPA violations to look out for if you are receiving calls from debt collectors.

  1. Calling  before 8:00am or after 9:00pm
  2. Calling you at work more than once or after you have told them to stop calling you at work.
  3. Calling third-parties (friends, neighbors, relatives) more than once in an attempt to locate you.
  4. Informing third-parties (your spouse is an exception) that the debt collector is attempting to collect a debt from you.
  5. Contact you after you have sent a certified letter to the debt collector instructing them not to contact you.
  6. Attempting to collect a debt that you do not owe.
  7. Lying or using other deceptive methods when attempting to collect a debt.
  8. Leave a message on an answering machine without saying that the collector is trying to collect a debt. The collector must leave his name and his company. (This is a double-edged sword because they are opening themselves up to another FDCPA violation by possibly disclosing to a third-party, who overhears the message,  that you owe a debt when they leave a voicemail.)
  9. Threatening you with arrest or going to jail.
  10. Threatening to sue the consumer when they have no intention of doing so. (If several months or years pass after the threat and the debt collector has not attempted to serve you than they are in violation.
  11. Use profanity or other abusive language.
  12. Shout, scream, or get angry with you.
  13. Give the impression that the caller or his company has some connection with the government, the courts, the police, other law enforcement, etc.
  14. Attempt to collect the incorrect debt amount
  15. Call you repeatedly. One call a week is acceptable, but multiple calls in a week could be considered harassment by the court.
  16. Attempt to contact you after the debt collector knows you have hired consumer protection attorney.
  17. Threaten to use violence if you fail to pay the debt.

If you are receiving harassing calls from debt collectors falsely claiming to be attorneys or violating the FDCPA in other ways, document it and call my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...