A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Categories:

323-690-1688 TODD CAN HELP

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat deceptive and unfair business practices. Understanding these protections helps consumers recognize violations and pursue appropriate remedies.

  • California’s UCL is the broadest unfair competition law in the nation
  • UCL prohibits any unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business practice
  • Consumers can obtain restitution and injunctive relief through UCL claims
  • False advertising violates both the UCL and California’s False Advertising Law

Understanding California’s Unfair Competition Law

California Business and Professions Code Section 17200, known as the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), prohibits any unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice. This intentionally broad language covers virtually any improper business conduct affecting California consumers.

What Qualifies as Unfair, Unlawful, or Fraudulent

“Unlawful” practices include violations of any law—federal, state, or local. A business violating the FDCPA, TCPA, or Truth in Lending Act also violates the UCL.

“Unfair” practices are those whose harm to consumers outweighs their utility. “Fraudulent” practices include conduct likely to deceive members of the public, even without proof of actual deception.

Consumer Remedies Under the UCL

Consumers can obtain restitution of money or property lost due to unfair practices and injunctive relief stopping ongoing violations. While the UCL does not provide for damages or attorney’s fees standing alone, these may be available through companion statutes.

False Advertising Claims

California’s False Advertising Law (Business and Professions Code Section 17500) prohibits untrue or misleading advertising. Combined with UCL claims, consumers can challenge deceptive marketing, hidden fees, bait-and-switch tactics, and misleading product claims.

Class Action Consumer Cases

UCL claims frequently proceed as class actions when businesses engage in practices affecting numerous consumers identically. Class actions aggregate claims, making it economically feasible to challenge widespread misconduct where individual damages are small.

Statute of Limitations for UCL Claims

The UCL has a four-year statute of limitations running from when the cause of action accrued. For ongoing violations, each instance of misconduct may restart the limitations period.

Published: October 9, 2025

Updated: December 12, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.