As of April 1st, the California Supreme Court has ruled that California’s prohibition against recording phone calls without consent applies to everyone on the call. The ruling comes after several years of legal proceedings fought by the Law Offices of Todd Friedman, alongside other notable consumer protection law firms, on behalf of the plaintiff Jeremiah Smith.

Smith filed his lawsuit in 2016, claiming that the loan provider LoanMe had recorded him on a phone call without his consent. His argument was that California’s penal code Section 632.7 clearly states that it is a crime to record or intercept a phone call without all parties’ consent.

Download Now. Privacy On The Line: Illegal Call Recordings and California’s Invasion of Privacy Act

Smith and the Law Offices of Todd Friedman appealed to the California Supreme Court for review on the basis of the Fourth Appellate Court’s decision conflicting with previous case law. The entire California Supreme Court bench voted to hear the case, and the review was granted. Upon deliberation, the justices came to a unanimous decision reversing the Fourth Appellate Court’s decision.

Per the ruling, Section 632.7 applies to both parties and nonparties alike. According to Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, the previous ruling by the court of appeal’s decision was the “first published opinion by a California appellate court to have specifically addressed whether section 632.7 applies to the intentional recording of a communication by a party” and it “departs from the majority view of the federal district courts that have considered the same issue.”

The new ruling is a significant victory for privacy in California. Now, because of the hard work of the Law Offices of Todd Friedman, California residents’ rights to private communication remain intact. Neither malicious nonparties nor any of the parties on a call may use non-consensual call recordings against others. The California Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 632.7, and everyone in the state can feel secure in their right to that privacy.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

Federal Overtime Rule Changes Blocked: What Los Angeles Workers Need to Know in 2025

The blocked federal overtime rule changes create confusion for Los Angeles workers, but understanding current exemption standards and California's stronger protections remains crucial for ensuring you receive proper overtime pay.

LA Jury Awards Record $27.5 Million in Nursing Discrimination Case: What Los Angeles Employees Need to Know

A groundbreaking $27.5 million jury verdict in Los Angeles is sending shockwaves through California's employment law landscape, demonstrating that workplace discrimination claims are being taken more seriously than ever before.

Wrongful Termination in Los Angeles: When Your Firing Violates California Law

While California is an at-will employment state, numerous exceptions protect Los Angeles workers from wrongful termination based on illegal discrimination, retaliation, or violations of public policy.